Parent plan · Week 12 · Reading Informational Text — Text Structures — core session 2 — English 6

Parent teaching plan · 36 weeks

Units to teach or revisit

Chapter 3 · Reading Informational Text

Assigned readings

Follow the chapter/unit sequence here; the student-facing lesson names do not depend on a calendar week. Keep drafts, reading notes and corrections in a portfolio.

This week’s goals

Read The Secret Garden, Chapters 6–7. Keep a literal summary, a short quotation, a choice or idea and one question for each assigned chapter. Read the assigned complete short selections. For books, follow the chapter groups above, keep early interpretations tentative and return to whole-book conclusions after finishing. For an exam week, the unseen paper supplies its own sources.

Five sessions of 45–60 minutes. English courses add 20–30 minutes of sustained book reading on most days. Exam papers retain their full stated time; combine blocks where specified, then use the remaining time for marking and correction.

Session 1 · Text Structures — core session 2

The fastest way to spot a structure is to hunt for signal words, the little linking words that give the pattern away. 'First,' 'next,' and 'finally' wave a flag for sequence. 'Because,' 'so,' 'as a result,' and 'therefore' point to cause and effect. 'However,' 'similarly,' 'unlike,' and 'both' announce compare and contrast. And wording like 'the problem is...' followed by 'one solution is...' clearly signals problem and solution. Train your eye to catch these words, and the structure will often name itself. Here's the part many readers miss: structure isn't just tidy housekeeping — it shapes meaning, and sometimes even helps persuade. A cause-and-effect structure can make an idea feel logical and almost certain, as though this simply must lead to that. A compare-and-contrast structure quietly nudges you to decide which option comes out ahead. So the structure an author reaches for is itself a clue about what they want you to think, not only about what they want you to know.

Your task

Read Parts 3–4 of Text Structures. Answer both pause questions without viewing the models, then work through example 2. Explain one step in your own words.

  1. Retrieve the relevant definition and restate the question.
  2. Read the supplied selection or case; mark the exact evidence or structure.
  3. Complete the task independently before opening the response guidance.
  4. Explain the relationship, compare the model and record a specific revision or unresolved question.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with the actual source detail or sentence; keep the claim within what it establishes.

A signal word indicates a proposed relationship, not proof of its truth. Identify the stated cause, the process connecting it to the effect and the evidence, then compare an alternative. In the first case, Cause and effect structure — signaled by 'Because,' 'As a result,' and 'then,' which link each event to the result it causes. In the changed case, A follows a process through pathways; B uses a comparison to inspect differences between surfaces. Both can explain water movement, but the same category must be used on both sides of B’s comparison. The method of defining the relationship and testing relevant evidence transfers; the particular source detail and scope must be checked anew.

  • Answer the specific question accurately.
  • Use a relevant detail and explain why it matters.
  • Apply the unit’s defined terms or method correctly.
  • Recognize a meaningful limitation or alternative.

Session 2 · Text Structures — independent study

Teach this unit across two core sessions: Parts 1–2 with the first worked case, then Parts 3–4 with the changed case and independent application. Allow 45–60 minutes per session, followed by separate reading/writing or source-study sessions in the parent plan. Pause at each question; do not assign this entire page as one short lecture.

Your task

Independent evidence response — Text Structures: Identify the text structure of this original passage and point to the signal words that prove it. Use the supplied case first, then choose one detail from the linked local reading to show where the same method applies or needs adjustment.

  1. Retrieve the relevant definition and restate the question.
  2. Read the supplied selection or case; mark the exact evidence or structure.
  3. Complete the task independently before opening the response guidance.
  4. Explain the relationship, compare the model and record a specific revision or unresolved question.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with the actual source detail or sentence; keep the claim within what it establishes.

Cause and effect structure — signaled by 'Because,' 'As a result,' and 'then,' which link each event to the result it causes. In the transfer paragraph, name a genuine detail from the complete reading and explain the connection. A copied example without a new detail has not completed the transfer.

  • Answer the specific question accurately.
  • Use a relevant detail and explain why it matters.
  • Apply the unit’s defined terms or method correctly.
  • Recognize a meaningful limitation or alternative.

Session 3 · Text Structures — revision conference

Teach this unit across two core sessions: Parts 1–2 with the first worked case, then Parts 3–4 with the changed case and independent application. Allow 45–60 minutes per session, followed by separate reading/writing or source-study sessions in the parent plan. Pause at each question; do not assign this entire page as one short lecture.

Your task

Revision and explanation — Text Structures: revisit your independent response. Write a fair alternative or identify a specific overstatement. Show an original and revised sentence, explain the change, and give a source-based reason for retaining or changing the conclusion.

  1. Retrieve the relevant definition and restate the question.
  2. Read the supplied selection or case; mark the exact evidence or structure.
  3. Complete the task independently before opening the response guidance.
  4. Explain the relationship, compare the model and record a specific revision or unresolved question.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with the actual source detail or sentence; keep the claim within what it establishes.

Cause and effect structure — signaled by 'Because,' 'As a result,' and 'then,' which link each event to the result it causes. The revision should repair a particular reasoning, evidence or language problem rather than only replace a word. A defensible alternative is acceptable when it explains the same evidence and its limits.

  • Answer the specific question accurately.
  • Use a relevant detail and explain why it matters.
  • Apply the unit’s defined terms or method correctly.
  • Recognize a meaningful limitation or alternative.

Session 4 · Author's Purpose & Point of View — core session 1

Every piece of writing was made for a reason, and that reason is the author's purpose. Most purposes fall into four groups that are easy to remember. Writing that sets out to *inform* gives you facts, like a weather report or an encyclopedia entry. Writing that sets out to *persuade* tries to change what you think or do, like an ad or an opinion column. Writing that sets out to *entertain* is mostly there for enjoyment, like a funny personal story. And writing that sets out to *explain* walks you through how or why something works, like an article on how volcanoes erupt. Figuring out which of these an author is going for is your first move as a careful reader. Real texts often mix these purposes, and that's where readers get tripped up. A persuasive article will happily give you true facts — but it picks and arranges those facts to nudge you toward one conclusion, so its main job is still to persuade. The trick is to ask which purpose is steering the wheel. Don't assume that just because a piece is packed with facts it must only be informing you; a page full of accurate numbers can still be built to sell you something.

Your task

Read Parts 1–2 of Author's Purpose & Point of View. Answer both pause questions without viewing the models, then work through example 1. Explain one step in your own words.

  1. Retrieve the relevant definition and restate the question.
  2. Read the supplied selection or case; mark the exact evidence or structure.
  3. Complete the task independently before opening the response guidance.
  4. Explain the relationship, compare the model and record a specific revision or unresolved question.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with the actual source detail or sentence; keep the claim within what it establishes.

Purpose: to persuade readers to oppose cutting school buses. Point of view: strongly against the plan, conveyed through loaded language like 'a huge mistake' and 'plain carelessness,' and by playing down the town's money-saving reason while playing up the harm to students. The organizer advocates and reports a small group’s preference. The supervisor raises a staffing constraint. The record reports use on two trial days; it does not directly establish learning gains or whole-school preference.

  • Answer the specific question accurately.
  • Use a relevant detail and explain why it matters.
  • Apply the unit’s defined terms or method correctly.
  • Recognize a meaningful limitation or alternative.

Session 5 · Author's Purpose & Point of View — core session 2

Besides *why* an author writes, there's *where they stand* — their point of view, meaning their own attitude or opinion about the subject. A point of view leaks out through the words a writer chooses and through what they decide to put in or leave out. Imagine two people describing the very same new rule: one calls it 'a smart, fair change,' while the other calls it 'a pointless new headache.' Neither one is making up facts, yet each phrase quietly shows which way the writer leans. Two clues help you hear a point of view. Tone is the author's attitude as you can hear it in their words — the same news can be reported in a tone that's excited, worried, admiring, or coolly neutral. Loaded language is wording picked on purpose to stir up strong feelings, like calling a project 'a bold rescue plan' instead of just 'a plan.' When you notice a writer reaching for dramatic, emotional words instead of plain ones, that's a strong sign their point of view is showing through.

Your task

Read Parts 3–4 of Author's Purpose & Point of View. Answer both pause questions without viewing the models, then work through example 2. Explain one step in your own words.

  1. Retrieve the relevant definition and restate the question.
  2. Read the supplied selection or case; mark the exact evidence or structure.
  3. Complete the task independently before opening the response guidance.
  4. Explain the relationship, compare the model and record a specific revision or unresolved question.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with the actual source detail or sentence; keep the claim within what it establishes.

A persuasive source can use numbers, accurately or inaccurately. Identify the audience and proposed response, then evaluate the number’s group, method and relevance separately from purpose. In the first case, Purpose: to persuade readers to oppose cutting school buses. Point of view: strongly against the plan, conveyed through loaded language like 'a huge mistake' and 'plain carelessness,' and by playing down the town's money-saving reason while playing up the harm to students. In the changed case, The organizer advocates and reports a small group’s preference. The supervisor raises a staffing constraint. The record reports use on two trial days; it does not directly establish learning gains or whole-school preference. The method of defining the relationship and testing relevant evidence transfers; the particular source detail and scope must be checked anew.

  • Answer the specific question accurately.
  • Use a relevant detail and explain why it matters.
  • Apply the unit’s defined terms or method correctly.
  • Recognize a meaningful limitation or alternative.

Submit this week

Parent / teacher weekly conference

Ask the learner to summarize the source before discussing an inference. Check two details against the local text. Use the criteria to discuss reasoning, then choose the next step from the response rather than from completion alone.

Browse all courses