Parent plan · Week 3 · Plot & Conflict: How Events Change the Stakes · Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know — English 7: Reading, Evidence & Expression

Parent teaching plan · 36 weeks

Units to teach or revisit

Chapter 1 · Close Reading & Literary Analysis

Assigned readings

This is the parent timetable. Student navigation follows chapters and units. A week can finish one chapter and begin the next; follow the named lessons in order and retain drafts and reading notes.

This week’s goals

For the class sessions, read the named selections linked in the individual unit lessons: The Unfinished Sign, The Last Seat.

Five class sessions of about 40–45 minutes, plus 15–20 minutes of independent reading most days; the complete novel is assigned during that separate reading time. Adjust and extend for comprehension. The midterm uses two 45-minute sessions and the final three 40-minute sessions within their stated totals.

Session 1 · Plot & Conflict: How Events Change the Stakes · Develop and apply

A setting supplies conditions that shape possible action. Pacing is the amount of attention or space given to an event. Writers may slow a moment through description or dialogue and compress a longer period into a summary. Explain the effect on tension, emphasis, or understanding rather than counting sentences alone. A resolution addresses an important tension, but not every ending supplies certainty about all future outcomes. Identify what changes and what remains possible. An open ending can be purposeful when it matches a developing responsibility. Avoid treating the absence of complete certainty as an accidental missing answer.

Your task

For Plot & Conflict: How Events Change the Stakes, study Parts 3–4, then make a five-event plot map and explain two causal arrows.

  1. Prepare (5 minutes): recall the relevant distinction and state the task.
  2. Read or examine (10 minutes): use the named passage, source label, or sentence.
  3. Apply (20–25 minutes): complete the task independently and record references.
  4. Reflect (5 minutes): compare with criteria, revise one choice, and save the work.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with an accurate short detail. Explain its job before extending the claim.

The sign begins the goal; the blocked room reveals an obstacle; the entrance test supplies new evidence; revised layout and cards respond to it; the tray invites future feedback. The test causes revision by changing Leila’s view, and Saturday’s card problem reinforces the need for continued adjustment. The map should not end with a claim of universal perfection.

  • Accurately complete the assigned task using the supplied reading or sentence.
  • Explain a relevant detail or grammatical/craft relationship.
  • Preserve a significant qualification and use a traceable reference when needed.

Session 2 · Plot & Conflict: How Events Change the Stakes · Practice and revise

Retrieve the distinction rather than memorize model wording. Discuss one missed question, then answer the exit ticket independently.

Your task

For Plot & Conflict: How Events Change the Stakes, attempt practice questions 1–6 without models, then answer: If a plot map lists only dates or paragraph numbers, what is missing? Save a correction explaining one change.

  1. Prepare (5 minutes): recall the relevant distinction and state the task.
  2. Read or examine (10 minutes): use the named passage, source label, or sentence.
  3. Apply (20–25 minutes): complete the task independently and record references.
  4. Reflect (5 minutes): compare with criteria, revise one choice, and save the work.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with an accurate short detail. Explain its job before extending the claim.

It lacks the relationships between decisions, obstacles, and consequences. Add explanations of why selected events redirect the action.

  • Accurately complete the assigned task using the supplied reading or sentence.
  • Explain a relevant detail or grammatical/craft relationship.
  • Preserve a significant qualification and use a traceable reference when needed.

Session 3 · Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know · Read and distinguish

Pronouns help identify narrative person, but they do not tell you everything about knowledge. Ask whose thoughts are available and how the narration presents them. A third-person text may restrict information to one character, while a first-person narrator may report later reflection. State both voice and information access when explaining an effect. An opinion may belong to the character whose thoughts are presented. Check how later evidence supports or challenges it. Do not promote an untested thought into an established fact about someone else. Narration can expose a mistake by allowing readers to compare the thought with events.

Your task

For Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know, read the assigned selection and study Parts 1–2. Write two located notes and answer both checkpoints before opening their guidance.

  1. Prepare (5 minutes): recall the relevant distinction and state the task.
  2. Read or examine (10 minutes): use the named passage, source label, or sentence.
  3. Apply (20–25 minutes): complete the task independently and record references.
  4. Reflect (5 minutes): compare with criteria, revise one choice, and save the work.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with an accurate short detail. Explain its job before extending the claim.

It identifies pronoun form but not the narrator’s access or its effect. The text stays close to Mateo’s awareness, allowing readers to see his assumption and later revision. Treat it as his interpretation, not a confirmed account of Hana’s wishes. Compare the coats, the doorway position, and her later request for space.

  • Accurately complete the assigned task using the supplied reading or sentence.
  • Explain a relevant detail or grammatical/craft relationship.
  • Preserve a significant qualification and use a traceable reference when needed.

Session 4 · Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know · Develop and apply

Changing perspective changes which experiences can be reported, not just which pronouns appear. A revision from Hana’s position would need to distinguish supported actions from invented inner thoughts. When you create a new version, label it as your fictional adaptation rather than claiming the original supplies that information. Limited access can make a discovery meaningful because the reader encounters a mistaken assumption before its correction. Explain which uncertainty the perspective preserves and how later evidence changes it. A narrator’s limitation does not automatically mean deliberate lying; distinguish restricted knowledge, error, and intentional deception.

Your task

For Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know, study Parts 3–4, then explain how following Mateo shapes the reader’s understanding of Hana’s arrival.

  1. Prepare (5 minutes): recall the relevant distinction and state the task.
  2. Read or examine (10 minutes): use the named passage, source label, or sentence.
  3. Apply (20–25 minutes): complete the task independently and record references.
  4. Reflect (5 minutes): compare with criteria, revise one choice, and save the work.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with an accurate short detail. Explain its job before extending the claim.

The narration follows Mateo’s wish for a predictable seating plan, making his assumption that Hana likes standing available to the reader. Her observation about the timetable and request for an unnumbered chair then challenge the assumption. This sequence reveals the limits of his certainty without claiming that the original narrator knows all of Hana’s thoughts.

  • Accurately complete the assigned task using the supplied reading or sentence.
  • Explain a relevant detail or grammatical/craft relationship.
  • Preserve a significant qualification and use a traceable reference when needed.

Session 5 · Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know · Practice and revise

Retrieve the distinction rather than memorize model wording. Discuss one missed question, then answer the exit ticket independently.

Your task

For Point of View: What a Narrator Can Know, attempt practice questions 1–6 without models, then answer: Would replacing every name with I necessarily create a convincing first-person version? Save a correction explaining one change.

  1. Prepare (5 minutes): recall the relevant distinction and state the task.
  2. Read or examine (10 minutes): use the named passage, source label, or sentence.
  3. Apply (20–25 minutes): complete the task independently and record references.
  4. Reflect (5 minutes): compare with criteria, revise one choice, and save the work.
Hint and response guidance

Begin with an accurate short detail. Explain its job before extending the claim.

No. The version must also change what the narrator can know, remember, and choose to report. Pronoun replacement alone does not establish a coherent perspective.

  • Accurately complete the assigned task using the supplied reading or sentence.
  • Explain a relevant detail or grammatical/craft relationship.
  • Preserve a significant qualification and use a traceable reference when needed.

Submit this week

Parent / teacher weekly conference

Discuss one accurate inference, one source or language distinction, and one revision. Keep oral feedback about meaning separate from accent or family background. Check the actual chapter reading log rather than assuming a completed screen proves comprehension.

Browse all courses