Close Reading & Literary Analysis — Problem set, Grade 9
Use the grade’s short story to explain how a change in a character or narrator develops a larger idea. Analyze two details from different parts and one craft choice.
Review the key ideas
Theme & Central Idea
A theme is a supported interpretation of what a text suggests about a topic. Symbols and recurring patterns can develop it; several readings may be defensible.
Characterization & Complex Characters
Infer a character’s motives from actions, speech, thoughts, and how others respond. Distinguish what a character says from what the story gives you reason to believe.
Figurative & Connotative Language
First distinguish literal description from language that transfers a comparison, exaggeration, or other meaning. Name a device only after interpreting its role in context.
Text Structure & Order of Events
Separate plot events from the order in which a writer presents them. A flashback can make readers reassess an action; a delayed explanation can create uncertainty.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
The story suggests that worth can come from use and connection rather than winning. The hidden trophy first represents failed status; its visible use for a shared activity suggests a different measure of value.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Jonah moves from cataloging an apparently settled map to preserving conflicting accounts with dates and uncertainty. The blank cards at the end show that a responsible record can invite further evidence rather than present itself as complete. Support this interpretation with precisely located details from the selection; recognize what the ending leaves unresolved.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
Her words distance her from the team, but the repair suggests attachment or responsibility. The text supports a conflict between wanting independence and caring; it does not establish why she hides that care.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Jonah moves from cataloging an apparently settled map to preserving conflicting accounts with dates and uncertainty. The blank cards at the end show that a responsible record can invite further evidence rather than present itself as complete. Support this interpretation with precisely located details from the selection; recognize what the ending leaves unresolved.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
A door normally enables entry, but the misplaced handle prevents control. The metaphor suggests apparent access without a practical ability to choose, fitting the difficulty of noticing or changing permissions.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Jonah moves from cataloging an apparently settled map to preserving conflicting accounts with dates and uncertainty. The blank cards at the end show that a responsible record can invite further evidence rather than present itself as complete. Support this interpretation with precisely located details from the selection; recognize what the ending leaves unresolved.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Initially the empty chair is a puzzle. The flashback makes it evidence of a hoped-for repair, so the final absence carries personal disappointment rather than being ordinary unused seating.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Jonah moves from cataloging an apparently settled map to preserving conflicting accounts with dates and uncertainty. The blank cards at the end show that a responsible record can invite further evidence rather than present itself as complete. Support this interpretation with precisely located details from the selection; recognize what the ending leaves unresolved.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.