Relevance — English definition

Defined in 3 courses:

Where it is taught

In use

Relevance asks whether that information helps answer this question.

Source Credibility, Relevance & Corroboration

That is a question of relevance — how directly a source actually speaks to your specific question.

Evaluating Sources

The first is relevance: does this evidence actually bear on this claim?

Evaluating Reasoning & Evidence

Questions using relevance

Problem 1

Explain relevance in your own words and give an example from the assigned reading or a fresh sentence.
Answer and explanation

The relationship between evidence and the specific question being investigated. The unit case offers this example to examine: The repost depends on the same original responses, so a new design does not create independent observations. The letter adds a differently situated access concern. It does not verify every number or represent all nonattendees; the sources support different parts of the inquiry and should be evaluated accordingly. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.

Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.

Problem 2

Which statement is accurate for Source Credibility, Relevance & Corroboration?
  1. A polished website proves accuracy.
  2. corroboration: Comparison with independently produced evidence that supports or challenges a claim.
  3. Several copies of one report are independent corroboration.
  4. Every correct response must exactly copy the model wording.
Answer and explanation

corroboration: Comparison with independently produced evidence that supports or challenges a claim.

Comparison with independently produced evidence that supports or challenges a claim. The repost depends on the same original responses, so a new design does not create independent observations. The letter adds a differently situated access concern. It does not verify every number or represent all nonattendees; the sources support different parts of the inquiry and should be evaluated accordingly.

Problem 3

Decide how to use the sources. Give a detail and explain its relevance.
Answer and explanation

Trace the count to the original report and check whether attendance includes a different group. Until that distinction is documented, cite the report’s 38 volunteers and label the larger claim unverified.

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Problem 4

Explain the difference between the 'relevance' and the 'sufficiency' of evidence, using your own brief example.
Answer and explanation

Relevance is whether evidence actually bears on the claim; sufficiency is whether there is enough of it. For example, one satisfied customer's review is relevant to a claim that a product works, but a single review is not sufficient to prove it works for most people.

Taught alongside

Elsewhere

Browse all courses