Synthesis — English definition
Defined in 5 courses:
- An explanation connecting evidence or ideas rather than listing separate summaries. (English 7: Reading, Evidence & Expression)
- Combining information from multiple sources into one original, organized idea — more than just summarizing each source separately. (English 9: Experience, Perspective & Inquiry)
- Combining multiple sources into one original, organized argument — more than summarizing each source separately. (English 10: Choices, Conscience & Consequences)
- Combining multiple sources into one original, organized idea — more than summarizing each source separately. (English 11: American Voices, Identity & Public Memory)
- Combining many sources into one original, organized idea threaded across an essay — not summarizing each source in turn. (English 12: Complex Texts, Independent Inquiry & Public Voice)
Where it is taught
- Compare Literary Texts: Shared Questions, Different Choices — Poetry, Drama & Comparison, English 7: Reading, Evidence & Expression, Grade 7
- Synthesizing Evidence — Research & Source-Based Writing, English 9: Experience, Perspective & Inquiry, Grade 9
- Synthesis Writing — Research & Source-Based Writing, English 10: Choices, Conscience & Consequences, Grade 10
- Synthesizing Multiple Sources — Research & Source-Based Writing, English 11: American Voices, Identity & Public Memory, Grade 11
- Synthesizing Complex Sources — Research & Source-Based Writing, English 12: Complex Texts, Independent Inquiry & Public Voice, Grade 12
In use
Synthesis is the real skill: you put those sources into conversation with one another and with your own point.
Synthesizing Evidence
Synthesis is the real skill: you put those sources into conversation with one another and with your own thinking.
Synthesis Writing
The engine of synthesis is noticing relationships among sources, and at this level it pays to name them precisely.
Synthesizing Multiple Sources
Questions using synthesis
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
An explanation connecting evidence or ideas rather than listing separate summaries. The unit case offers this example to examine: Both characters revise a confident arrangement after noticing something it missed. Leila keeps the welcome sign but changes the practical room and feedback process. Mateo keeps the discussion questions but removes fixed seat numbers. The comparison suggests that revising a plan can preserve its useful purpose while changing its limits; the different settings produce different actions. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 2
- Source A says X. Source B says Y. Source C says Z.
- Explaining what Source A argues in one paragraph, with no other sources mentioned.
- Comparing Source A and Source B's differing conclusions, then explaining what that disagreement suggests about the issue overall.
- Copying three quotations in a row with no connecting sentences.
Answer and explanation
Comparing Source A and Source B's differing conclusions, then explaining what that disagreement suggests about the issue overall.
True synthesis puts sources into conversation with each other and adds original analysis, rather than listing or copying them separately.
Problem 3
- Quotation, quotation, quotation, no explanation.
- Original topic sentence, evidence from multiple sources with signal phrases, original analysis connecting it to the writer's claim.
- A single source summarized at length with no other sources referenced.
- A list of citations with no sentences connecting them.
Answer and explanation
Original topic sentence, evidence from multiple sources with signal phrases, original analysis connecting it to the writer's claim.
This structure leads with the writer's own point, brings in multiple sources properly introduced, and closes with original analysis — the hallmark of synthesis.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
The sources agree on the value of access but reveal an unfunded staffing condition. A limited trial could test demand only after identifying wage funding; the materials grant cannot be treated as available staffing money. A complete response supplies context, a focused claim, a brief supporting detail, explanation, and a relevant qualification. Do not simply repeat this model.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Taught alongside
- comparison criterion
- evidence
- qualification
- revision
- signal phrase
- integrate
- synthesis matrix
- source-by-source structure
- concession
- corroborate
- qualify
- tension
- scholarly source
- primary source