How to Write a Proof — Drills

How to Write a Proof has 5 drill skills. Each one generates fresh questions every time, with a hint and full worked steps, so you can keep practising a single skill until it settles.

What these drills cover

These questions use 17 ideas from the course. Follow any of them for a definition, where it is taught, and what it leads to.

Structure

Unlimited questions of this kind are generated in the app. Two examples:

Problem 1

What is always the first line of a two-column proof?

  1. The given
  2. A theorem
  3. What you are proving
  4. A definition
Worked answer

The given

You start from what you were handed.

So the answer is: The given.

Problem 2

A statement in a proof with no reason beside it is

  1. acceptable once per proof
  2. a definition
  3. not acceptable, even if true
  4. fine if obvious
Worked answer

not acceptable, even if true

A true statement is not the same as a proved one.

So the answer is: not acceptable, even if true.

Converse

Unlimited questions of this kind are generated in the app. Two examples:

Problem 1

Is the converse of "if a shape is a square, it has four right angles" true? Answer yes or no.

Worked answer

no

Converse: if a shape has four right angles, it is a square.

Counterexample: a non-square rectangle.

Problem 2

Is the converse of "if two lines are parallel, they never meet" true? Answer yes or no.

Worked answer

yes

Converse: if two lines never meet, they are parallel.

No counterexample exists — in a plane this one does hold.

Counter

Unlimited questions of this kind are generated in the app. Two examples:

Problem 1

Give a counterexample to "if two triangles have the same perimeter they are congruent".

Worked answer

a 3-4-5 and a 4-4-4 triangle

A 3-4-5 and a 4-4-4 triangle satisfies the condition but not the conclusion.

Disproving needs one case; proving needs an argument.

Problem 2

Give a counterexample to "all quadrilaterals with four equal sides are squares".

Worked answer

a rhombus

A rhombus satisfies the condition but not the conclusion.

Disproving needs one case; proving needs an argument.

Reasoning it through

Unlimited questions of this kind are generated in the app. Two examples:

Problem 1

You know M is the midpoint of AB. What reason lets you write that AM = MB?

Worked answer

definition of midpoint

AM = MB.

Reason: definition of midpoint.

Problem 2

You know two triangles share a side. What reason lets you write that that side is congruent to itself?

Worked answer

reflexive property

That side is congruent to itself.

Reason: reflexive property.

Logic

Unlimited questions of this kind are generated in the app. Two examples:

Problem 1

If "if P then Q" is true, which of these is also always true?

  1. If not Q then not P
  2. If Q then P
  3. None of these
  4. If not P then not Q
Worked answer

If not Q then not P

The contrapositive is always true alongside the original.

The converse (Q → P) and inverse are not.

Browse all courses