Pollution, Carbon & Climate Evidence — Chapter Practice, Grade 12

Connect pollutant transport, carbon chemistry, radiation balance, and long-term evidence.

Problem 1

Which of the following is an example of nonpoint-source pollution?
  1. A pipe discharging waste from a single factory into a river
  2. Smoke pouring from one power plant's smokestack
  3. Fertilizer and motor oil washing off lawns and roads across a whole watershed
  4. Untreated sewage released from one broken outfall pipe
Answer and explanation

Fertilizer and motor oil washing off lawns and roads across a whole watershed

Nonpoint-source pollution comes from many scattered, hard-to-identify sources at once, like runoff spread across an entire watershed, rather than from a single identifiable outlet.

Problem 2

Biomagnification refers to the way that
  1. decomposers break pollutants down into harmless molecules
  2. a pollutant spreads evenly through the air until it is harmless
  3. a factory's scrubber removes pollutants before they leave the smokestack
  4. a persistent pollutant becomes more concentrated in organisms at each higher step of a food chain
Answer and explanation

a persistent pollutant becomes more concentrated in organisms at each higher step of a food chain

Because predators eat many contaminated prey and store rather than excrete the toxin, persistent pollutants grow more concentrated at each higher trophic level.

Problem 3

Algae tissue contains 0.02 ppm of a persistent pesticide, which biomagnifies about 10 times at each step of the food chain algae → insects → small fish → heron. About what is the concentration, in ppm, in the heron?
Answer and explanation

20 ppm

Three steps of tenfold magnification: 0.02 × 10 × 10 × 10 = 0.02 × 1,000 = 20 ppm. This supplied teaching factor applies between feeding levels; water-to-organism uptake is bioconcentration.

Problem 4

Explain how fertilizer running off farm fields can create an oxygen-starved 'dead zone' in a bay.
Answer and explanation

The fertilizer adds extra nutrients to the water (eutrophication), which fuels a huge algal bloom. When the algae die, decomposers break them down and use up the water's dissolved oxygen. With the oxygen gone, fish and other organisms suffocate, leaving a lifeless 'dead zone.'

Problem 5

Why is nonpoint-source pollution generally harder to control than point-source pollution?
  1. It comes from many scattered, diffuse sources spread across the landscape, so there is no single pipe or stack to regulate
  2. It only occurs indoors, where it cannot be measured
  3. It is always invisible, while point-source pollution can always be seen
  4. Nonpoint pollution is always chemically more toxic than point-source pollution
Answer and explanation

It comes from many scattered, diffuse sources spread across the landscape, so there is no single pipe or stack to regulate

Point sources can be sampled and regulated at one outlet, but nonpoint pollution seeps in from countless diffuse locations at once, making it far harder to pinpoint and fix.

Problem 6

A stream carries 2 mg/L at 100 L/s. Find mass load. Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

Keep concentration and mass per time distinct.

Answer and explanation

200 mg/s.

Problem 7

Why distinguish hazard from exposure when assessing pollutant effects?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

A substance's harmful potential does not alone determine dose or risk; route, amount and duration matter.

Problem 8

Within-organism accumulation differs from food-web magnificationWithin-organism accumulation differs from food-web magnificationWater / uptakeExposureOrganism storageBioaccumulationPredator dietPossiblebiomagnificationPersistent, bioavailable compounds can behave differently.Not every pollutant accumulates or magnifies through a food web.
Original process distinction; no specific chemical concentration or universal factor is asserted.
Interpret the supplied visual. Does a high concentration in one fish alone prove biomagnification?
Answer and explanation

No. It can show exposure/accumulation but a trophic comparison with compatible concentrations is needed for magnification.

Bioaccumulation is buildup within an organism when uptake exceeds elimination over time. Biomagnification is increasing concentration across trophic positions through dietary transfer under appropriate persistence, uptake and elimination conditions. The concepts are related but not identical. Some compounds do neither, and comparing different tissues or wet/dry mass bases can mislead. Specify the chemical, tissue, concentration basis and food-web evidence before asserting a universal higher-predator pattern.

No. It can show exposure/accumulation but a trophic comparison with compatible concentrations is needed for magnification.

Response criteria

  • Interpret labels, structures, axes, units and directions correctly.
  • Explain the physical or environmental relationship or mechanism.
  • Respect stated assumptions and distinguish observation from inference.

Problem 9

An outlet flows 200 L/min at 3 mg/L. Find pollutant mass emitted in 1 h. Treatment captures 80% into sludge with no chemical destruction; find waterborne and captured mass.
Answer and explanation

Initial mass=200×60×3=36000 mg=36 g. Waterborne residual=7.2 g; captured mass=28.8 g. The captured material remains in the full system account.

Initial mass=200×60×3=36000 mg=36 g.

Waterborne residual=7.2 g; captured mass=28.8 g.

The captured material remains in the full system account.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Problem 10

Which of these gases is a major greenhouse gas that human activities are adding to the atmosphere?
  1. Argon (Ar)
  2. Carbon dioxide (CO2)
  3. Nitrogen (N2)
  4. Oxygen (O2)
Answer and explanation

Carbon dioxide (CO2)

Carbon dioxide absorbs and re-emits outgoing infrared heat and is released in huge quantities by burning fossil fuels; nitrogen, oxygen, and argon make up most of the atmosphere but do not trap heat this way.

Problem 11

Using the supplied comparison 280ppm to 420ppm, Atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen from about 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution to about 420 ppm in this supplied model. By what percentage has it increased?
Answer and explanation

50 %

The increase is 420 - 280 = 140 ppm; 140 ÷ 280 = 0.5, or a 50% increase.

Problem 12

Which of the following is a line of evidence that Earth's climate is warming?
  1. Earth's distance from the Sun is steadily increasing
  2. The atmosphere is gradually losing its oxygen
  3. Glaciers and polar ice sheets are shrinking and global sea level is rising
  4. The number of stars visible at night is steadily decreasing
Answer and explanation

Glaciers and polar ice sheets are shrinking and global sea level is rising

Shrinking ice and rising seas are among many independent measurements — along with the temperature record and ocean warming — that all indicate a warming climate.

Problem 13

Explain why burning coal, oil, and natural gas adds carbon dioxide to the atmosphere faster than the natural carbon cycle can remove it.
Answer and explanation

Fossil fuels store carbon that was locked underground and out of the active carbon cycle for millions of years. Burning them releases that ancient carbon as carbon dioxide in just decades or centuries — far faster than photosynthesis and the oceans can absorb it back — so carbon dioxide builds up in the atmosphere.

Problem 14

A friend points to one record-cold day and says it proves global warming isn't real. Using the difference between weather and climate, explain what is wrong with that argument.
Answer and explanation

Weather is the short-term, day-to-day state of the atmosphere, while climate is the long-term average of weather over decades. A single cold day is just weather and doesn't reveal the long-term trend. Climate change is measured by averaging temperature and other data over many years and across the whole globe, which clearly shows warming even though individual cold days still happen.

Problem 15

Why include oceans as well as air temperatures in climate-energy accounting? Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

Weather fluctuations do not directly establish long-term forcing.

Answer and explanation

Oceans store substantial heat, so air temperature alone does not capture the system's energy change.

Problem 16

Why are scenario projections conditional rather than exact predictions?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

Future emissions, responses and natural variability depend on uncertain choices and processes.

Problem 17

Separate an initiating forcing from a feedback responseSeparate an initiating forcing from a feedback responseExternal forcingChanged energy balanceTemperatureresponseStorage / delayedadjustmentFeedbackAmplifies or opposesresponseForcing, feedback and response are causal roles, not synonyms.Example feedback: warming → ice loss → less reflection → warming.
Original causal-role diagram; it is not a quantified climate sensitivity model.
Interpret the supplied visual. Why is “positive feedback” not a value judgment?
Answer and explanation

Positive describes a reinforcing causal loop, not whether the effect is desirable.

A forcing changes the external energy-balance conditions of the chosen system. A feedback is a response pathway that feeds back on the initial change: reduced reflective ice after warming can reinforce additional warming, while increased thermal emission with temperature supplies a stabilizing response. Reinforcing means amplifying, not beneficial; balancing means opposing, not necessarily harmless. Ocean heat capacity and circulation also create delays, so response need not be immediate.

Positive describes a reinforcing causal loop, not whether the effect is desirable.

Response criteria

  • Interpret labels, structures, axes, units and directions correctly.
  • Explain the physical or environmental relationship or mechanism.
  • Respect stated assumptions and distinguish observation from inference.

Problem 18

A model Earth absorbs 242 W/m² and emits 240 W/m² for 10 s. Find stored-energy increase per area and explain why this alone does not give a surface-temperature change.
Answer and explanation

Increase=(242−240)×10=20 J/m². Temperature change also needs heat capacity, depth/distribution of storage and coupled responses; this is a supplied short model interval, not an actual climate measurement.

Increase=(242−240)×10=20 J/m².

Temperature change also needs heat capacity, depth/distribution of storage and coupled responses; this is a supplied short model interval, not an actual climate measurement.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Problem 19

pH falls by 1. Find hydrogen-ion concentration factor.
Hints

Write the relationship first; substitute with consistent units.

Answer and explanation

10 times

10¹=10.

Problem 20

Can pH8.0 water be acidified relative to pH8.2?
Answer and explanation

Yes; its pH has declined even though it remains basic.

Response criteria

  • State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
  • Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
  • Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.

Problem 21

pH drops by .20. Find hydrogen-ion factor 10^.20.
Hints

List the given quantities, select a relationship, and check units before substituting.

Answer and explanation

1.585 times

10^.20≈1.585.

Problem 22

Why not equate acidification with warming?
Answer and explanation

They are distinct processes: acidification changes chemistry; warming changes temperature, though they can interact.

Response criteria

  • State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
  • Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
  • Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.

Problem 23

A pH drop is 0.3 units. Estimate the hydrogen-ion activity factor. Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

Acidification names a shift, not necessarily crossing neutral pH.

Answer and explanation

10^0.3≈2.0, about a doubling.

Problem 24

How can additional dissolved CO₂ affect carbonate availability?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

Carbonate-system equilibria shift, often lowering carbonate ion availability and affecting saturation, depending on conditions.

Problem 25

One pH change cannot determine every carbonate concentrationOne pH change cannot determine every carbonate concentrationQuestionEnoughinformation?ReasonH⁺ ratio from ΔpHApproximate yes10^(−ΔpH)Carbonate concentration from pHaloneNoNeeds coupledchemistry/boundary dataShell-building responseNoNeeds saturation andbiological contextA pH ratio is not automatically a carbonate-loss percentage.
Original inference-limit comparison; no empirical carbonate-loss percentage is supplied.
Interpret the supplied visual. What is wrong with saying a 0.1 pH fall proves 26% less carbonate?
Answer and explanation

The 26% calculation concerns[H⁺]; carbonate requires additional coupled-equilibrium information.

A known pH difference supports a hydrogen-ion ratio under the stated convention. It does not by itself determine carbonate concentration or a shell-dissolution rate. Alkalinity summarizes seawater’s acid-neutralizing charge account and helps constrain carbonate chemistry alongside dissolved inorganic carbon and conditions. Saturation state compares chemical conditions with mineral equilibrium. Keep these distinct quantities rather than converting a 26% hydrogen-ion increase directly into 26% carbonate loss or 26% biological harm.

The 26% calculation concerns[H⁺]; carbonate requires additional coupled-equilibrium information.

Response criteria

  • Interpret labels, structures, axes, units and directions correctly.
  • Explain the physical or environmental relationship or mechanism.
  • Respect stated assumptions and distinguish observation from inference.

Problem 26

A seawater sample changes frompH8.1 topH7.9. Estimate the[H⁺] ratio and explain whether that proves a 58% carbonate decrease.
Answer and explanation

[H⁺] increases by 10^0.2≈1.585, about 58.5%. It does not prove the same carbonate decrease; alkalinity, dissolved carbon and coupled-equilibrium conditions are also required.

[H⁺] increases by 10^0.2≈1.585, about 58.5%.

It does not prove the same carbonate decrease; alkalinity, dissolved carbon and coupled-equilibrium conditions are also required.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Problem 27

Temperature changes.6°C in 30 years. Find average change per decade.
Hints

Write the relationship first; substitute with consistent units.

Answer and explanation

0.2 °C/decade

.6/30×10=.2.

Problem 28

Why does one cold winter not settle the global climate trend?
Answer and explanation

Its spatial and temporal scope is narrower than the long-term global statistical question.

Response criteria

  • State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
  • Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
  • Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.

Problem 29

An anomaly rises .8°C over 40 years. Find average change per decade.
Hints

List the given quantities, select a relationship, and check units before substituting.

Answer and explanation

0.2 °C/decade

.8/40×10=.2.

Problem 30

Why separate projections from observations?
Answer and explanation

Projections depend on future scenarios and models; observations describe measured past/current conditions.

Response criteria

  • State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
  • Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
  • Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.

Problem 31

A linear fitted trend is 0.15°C/decade. What change does it imply over 30 years within that model? Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

Data coverage, baseline and uncertainty affect interpretation.

Answer and explanation

0.15×3=0.45°C.

Problem 32

Why use anomalies with a declared baseline when combining climate records?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

They compare deviations relative to a reference, reducing effects of different absolute local temperatures; the baseline must be clear.

Problem 33

Global inference needs coverage and independent measurement checksGlobal inference needs coverage and independent measurement checksIndicatorWhat it samplesUseful complementSurface temperatureNear-surface land/oceanestimatesSpatial coverage/methodchecksOcean heat contentEnergy stored in waterDepth-resolvedobservationsIce / sea levelPhysical responseindicatorsOther contributingmechanismsIndependent indicators do not mean identical instruments or coverage.
Original indicator/method comparison; the local annual file does not contain station coverage or uncertainty estimates.
Interpret the supplied visual. Can ocean heat content replace surface temperature one-for-one?
Answer and explanation

No. It measures a different aspect of the energy system and provides complementary evidence with its own coverage and uncertainty.

A global estimate combines observations with stated spatial coverage and analysis methods. Coverage bias can arise when sampled places differ systematically from missing places; measurement changes and calibration also require assessment. Independent datasets and indicators help test whether an apparent trend is an artifact of one method, although they need not measure exactly the same physical quantity. Do not invent a station-level error bar from the annual global values alone; use the source’s uncertainty methods.

No. It measures a different aspect of the energy system and provides complementary evidence with its own coverage and uncertainty.

Response criteria

  • Interpret labels, structures, axes, units and directions correctly.
  • Explain the physical or environmental relationship or mechanism.
  • Respect stated assumptions and distinguish observation from inference.

Problem 34

Two absolute global temperature estimates are 14.6°C and 15.0°C. Their baseline is 14.0°C, then changed to 14.2°C. Find both anomaly pairs and show whether their difference changes.
Answer and explanation

Original anomalies are 0.6 and 1.0°C; new anomalies 0.4 and 0.8°C. The difference remains 0.4°C, so a uniform baseline shift changes offset rather than physical change.

Original anomalies are 0.6 and 1.0°C; new anomalies 0.4 and 0.8°C.

The difference remains 0.4°C, so a uniform baseline shift changes offset rather than physical change.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Browse all courses