The Invisible Trillion · The Attention Chapter

What This Chapter Is Actually About

I started this chapter with my friend’s observation about food waste. Here is the version of her insight that goes one more step.

When food waste is visible, people feel bad about it, and they use less food. Fine. But food is the thing you physically eat, and it becomes you, and there is a limit. When something is infinite in supply and invisible in waste — like compute, like digital content, like the information streaming at you from every screen — the question “am I wasting it?” stops being useful. You cannot run out of it. It does not become you. The feedback loop is gone.

What replaces that feedback loop is a different question, which you have to ask yourself because nothing in the environment will ask it for you: Is this making me better?

Is this conversation with an AI making me smarter, or am I using it to avoid being smart? Is this video teaching me something, or am I watching it to keep from noticing that I’m bored? Is this article changing how I think, or am I nodding along because agreeing feels good? Is my life becoming more the life I want, or is it becoming the life that’s optimized to keep me on the app?

These are hard questions. Most people do not ask them well, which is part of why the world has gotten the answers wrong in a lot of specific ways. But they are the real questions, and the environmental ones are — honestly — downstream of them.

If you are careful with your own attention, the environmental questions mostly take care of themselves. Not because your individual queries matter much either way, but because careful people build careful institutions, and careful institutions make better decisions about where data centers go and what they run on and who pays for them.

If you are not careful with your own attention — if you let it be spent for you, in tiny increments, by algorithms that do not love you — then no amount of worrying about data centers is going to fix the part of the problem that is actually wrecking things.

The chip your phone is running right now is doing one of two things. It is helping you be more of who you want to be, or it is helping someone else turn you into a product. You get to decide which one, every time you pick it up.

That is the real question this book is about.


A note on sources: the food-waste-and-invisible-compute framing in this chapter originated in a conversation with a friend who saw it clearly before I did. The data-center-use breakdowns — streaming vs. social vs. AI — are from the International Energy Agency and from utility disclosures in markets where they’re required. The attention-economy framing draws on Tim Wu’s The Attention Merchants and Tristan Harris’s work at the Center for Humane Technology, both worth reading if this chapter interested you.

Questions to talk about

No answer key. These are for arguing over, with someone who read the same chapter.

  1. Thrown-away food is heavy in your hand; wasted computation is invisible. What does an absent feedback loop do to behaviour over time?
  2. The second half of the asymmetry cuts the other way — the bottleneck is not supply. What is actually scarce, and who is competing for it?
  3. 'You get to decide which one, every time you pick it up.' Is that true, given how the things we pick up are designed?

All 19 chapters of The Invisible Trillion · Library · All courses