Rhetorical Appeals — Practice · Grade 10 English
Chapter: Argument, Rhetoric & Tragic ChoicesWhat this practice covers
By the end of Rhetorical Appeals you should be able to:
- I can identify ethos, pathos, and logos in a speech or persuasive text.
- I can analyze how a writer combines the appeals to advance a specific purpose.
11 questions, multiple choice and written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: ethos, pathos, logos, rhetoric.
Problem 1
- none of these
- pathos
- logos
- ethos
Answer and explanation
ethos
Citing professional credentials to earn the audience's trust is an appeal to ethos.
Problem 2
- logos
- ethos
- a fallacy
- pathos
Answer and explanation
logos
Citing data from a large study is an appeal to logic — logos.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
Each appeal does a different job: ethos earns trust, pathos creates emotional investment, and logos supplies logical proof. Combining them reaches listeners who respond to facts and listeners who respond to feeling, while keeping the speaker's credibility present throughout — so the argument is convincing on more than one level at once.
Problem 4
- Logos, because it refers to employment
- Ethos and pathos together — establishing shared identity while stirring shared emotion
- Only ethos, since it mentions the candidate
- None of the appeals — it is a logical fallacy
Answer and explanation
Ethos and pathos together — establishing shared identity while stirring shared emotion
Claiming a shared background builds relatable credibility (ethos) while the memory of a parent losing work stirs emotion (pathos) — both at once.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Answers vary; look for a specific real or realistic example that names at least two appeals (ethos, pathos, or logos) and explains how each one was used to persuade the audience.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
The image invites concern for access; the count supplies a reason to investigate demand. The voluntary sample limits generalization, so the writer should not treat the emotional image as proof of prevalence.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Ask what the numbers measure and how they were gathered. An appeal to logos can be present even when its reasoning is weak.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Ethos concerns credibility, logos concerns reasons and evidence, and pathos concerns emotions or values. Appeals often work together in the same passage. The method transfers, but the particular detail, scope, and context must be read again. The image invites concern for access; the count supplies a reason to investigate demand. The voluntary sample limits generalization, so the writer should not treat the emotional image as proof of prevalence.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
The supervisory role supports relevant ethos; the proposed attendance trial uses logos. The observed waiting illustrates a need but does not establish schoolwide demand. A complete response supplies context, a focused claim, a brief supporting detail, explanation, and a relevant qualification. Do not simply repeat this model.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Check whether the response explains ethos concerns credibility, logos concerns reasons and evidence, and pathos concerns emotions or values. appeals often work together in the same passage. Ask for a relevant detail and the reason it supports the conclusion. Prioritize the mistaken assumption shown here: “Numbers always make an argument logical.”
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.
Problem 11
Answer and explanation
The report documents litter removal, the resident distinguishes water contamination, and the memo separates funding purposes. The event can be successful within its stated scope while water quality remains unresolved. The response must supply its own precise detail and explain it; copying the model without fresh evidence is insufficient.
Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.
Response criteria
- Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
- Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
- Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.