Citing Text Evidence & Explaining Inferences — Practice · Grade 7 English
Chapter: Information, Media & EvidenceWhat this practice covers
By the end of Citing Text Evidence & Explaining Inferences you should be able to:
- I can use the skills in Citing Text Evidence & Explaining Inferences with a relevant detail or sentence.
- I can explain the relationship, test a misleading claim, and revise independently.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: text evidence, commentary, evidence, qualification, revision.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
A detail from a text that supports a stated interpretation or claim. Read enough surrounding text to understand a quotation. Identify who speaks, what is happening, and what changes. A short quotation can be more useful than a paragraph copied without explanation. Your evidence must answer the actual question.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
This claim is misleading. Commentary explains how evidence supports a claim. “This shows the theme” simply announces a relationship. Explain the action, its contrast with an earlier choice, and its effect on your interpretation. Preserve a limit if the detail does not establish everything in the claim. Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. The reader needs to know which detail matters and how it supports the claim. A shorter traceable detail with an explanation often does more analytical work.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. The reader needs to know which detail matters and how it supports the claim. A shorter traceable detail with an explanation often does more analytical work.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
A detail from a text that supports a stated interpretation or claim. The unit case offers this example to examine: Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
The writer’s explanation of how evidence supports a claim. The unit case offers this example to examine: Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Read enough surrounding text to understand a quotation. Identify who speaks, what is happening, and what changes. A short quotation can be more useful than a paragraph copied without explanation. Your evidence must answer the actual question. Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Choose a location another reader can find. This anthology uses paragraph numbers, and the poems use line numbers. Cite those supplied divisions instead of inventing page numbers. A paraphrase still needs a source location when it supports your interpretation. Leila increasingly responds to a problem by revising her work rather than protecting its appearance. Paragraph 7 shows that she wants to hide the unreadable card but moves it nearer the door instead. That action matters because it contrasts with her opening wish for a certain-looking result; it does not mean that she stops feeling embarrassed.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.