Text Structures: Relationships That Organize Information — Practice · Grade 7 English
Chapter: Information, Media & EvidenceWhat this practice covers
By the end of Text Structures: Relationships That Organize Information you should be able to:
- I can use the skills in Text Structures: Relationships That Organize Information with a relevant detail or sentence.
- I can explain the relationship, test a misleading claim, and revise independently.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: sequence, cause and effect, evidence, qualification, revision.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
An arrangement showing order or steps. Identify how ideas are related: in time, by a proposed cause, through shared comparison criteria, or as a problem and response. A text can use several structures within different sections. Describe the relationship in the relevant passage rather than force one label onto everything.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
This claim is misleading. A comparison needs consistent criteria. A photograph and a log can be compared by what each records and what each omits. Changing the criterion midway creates a weak comparison. A striking photograph is not automatically a stronger record of repeated trials. The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. It can mark sequence without explaining a cause. Look for a supported mechanism or relationship between the events.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. It can mark sequence without explaining a cause. Look for a supported mechanism or relationship between the events.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
An arrangement showing order or steps. The unit case offers this example to examine: The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
A relationship explaining how a condition or action contributes to an outcome. The unit case offers this example to examine: The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule. Identify the wording or choice that fits the term. A different accurate example is acceptable.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Identify how ideas are related: in time, by a proposed cause, through shared comparison criteria, or as a problem and response. A text can use several structures within different sections. Describe the relationship in the relevant passage rather than force one label onto everything. The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Sequence gives an order; cause and effect explains a contribution to an outcome. “After” can show order without establishing a mechanism. In the article, recording a symptom before a trial is a sequence. Explaining why an absent entry cannot count as a failed trial gives a reason. The procedure uses sequence to show an order of actions. The missing-record passage explains a category distinction and the consequence of confusing categories. Order alone does not establish that one event caused another; the second explanation gives a reason for a recording rule.
Use the model to discuss reasoning after an independent attempt. A different accurate supported response can be correct; written work needs human marking.