Energy Flow in Ecosystems — Print · Grade 10 Science

Chapter: Ecosystems & Conservation Decisions

Energy Flow in Ecosystems

Learning goals

Readings for this unit

Before this unit

Distinguish matter recycling from energy transfer.

Use three flexible study sessions: core explanation and Parts 1–2; Parts 3–4 with their reasoning checks and models; then the whole-unit application, worked examples, independent practice, and exit check. Allow about 50–60 minutes per session, including diagrams, data work, and notebook explanations. Attempt each check before opening its guidance. Schedule chapter investigations, review, and exams separately; add time where prerequisites are uncertain. Trace the explained visual parts and write a first model, then attempt the illustrated and changed independent cases. In the third session explain a correction and revise the opening account using evidence.

Start with something to explain

Why can fewer producers by count or standing mass still support many consumers?

Illustrative evidence case. Stocks, production rates, transfer efficiencies and food-web positions describe different quantities.

Food-web arrows track material and energy transferFood-web arrows track material and energy transferProducerConsumerPredatorDecomposerResource → consumer; dead material / wastes reach decomposers
Original selected web with grouped organisms and representative routes; it omits many links and is not a surveyed ecosystem.

Notice and wonder

Record two observations using the stated quantities or relationships. Keep observations separate from possible causes. Write one question that a new measurement could help answer.

Why can fewer producers by count or standing mass still support many consumers?

Your first model

Label time interval and arrow convention before comparing a pyramid or network.

Build the language from the idea

autotroph
A 'self-feeder' — an organism such as a plant, alga, or certain bacterium that makes its own food, usually by photosynthesis. Also called a producer.
heterotroph
An 'other-feeder' — an organism that gets energy by consuming other organisms. Also called a consumer; includes herbivores, carnivores, and decomposers.
trophic level
A feeding step in an ecosystem — producers, then primary consumers, then secondary consumers, and so on.
biomass
The total mass of living matter at a trophic level or in an area; a rough stand-in for how much stored energy is present.
energy pyramid
A diagram showing how much usable energy is available at each trophic level, with producers forming the wide base.
ten percent rule
The generalization that only about 10% of the energy stored at one trophic level is passed on to the next; roughly 90% is used or lost as heat.
standing biomass
The biological material present at one instant, distinct from production per time.
transfer efficiency
A matched output/input ratio for a specified trophic transfer, time interval and boundary.

Almost every ecosystem on Earth runs on a single power source: the Sun. Capturing that energy is the job of autotrophs — plants, algae, and photosynthetic bacteria that use light to build sugars out of carbon dioxide and water. Because they manufacture their own food from scratch, autotrophs are also called *producers*, and they form the foundation that everything else is built on. (A few unusual autotrophs, such as the bacteria clustered around deep-sea hydrothermal vents, skip sunlight entirely and instead run on chemical energy through *chemosynthesis* — proof that the base of a food web just has to capture energy somehow, not necessarily from light.)

Every other organism is a heterotroph, or consumer, that must eat to obtain energy. Heterotrophs come in tiers: *primary consumers* (herbivores) eat producers directly, *secondary consumers* eat the herbivores, and *tertiary consumers* eat those. A third crucial group, the decomposers and detritivores — such as fungi and bacteria, plus detritivores such as earthworms and scavengers such as vultures — feed on dead bodies and waste, breaking them down and returning nutrients to the soil so producers can use them again. A single line showing who eats whom is a *food chain*, but real ecosystems are tangled: most species eat several foods and are eaten by several predators, so ecologists connect the chains into a food web that reveals just how interdependent a community really is.

Food-web arrows track material and energy transferFood-web arrows track material and energy transferProducerConsumerPredatorDecomposerResource → consumer; dead material / wastes reach decomposers
Original selected web with grouped organisms and representative routes; it omits many links and is not a surveyed ecosystem.

Each feeding step in that web is a trophic level. Tracking energy as it climbs from one trophic level to the next uncovers the single most important rule in this whole unit — and it starts with a question: when a rabbit eats grass, where does all the grass's energy go? Most of it never becomes rabbit at all. The rabbit spends the bulk of its food energy simply staying alive — moving, growing, and generating body heat — and much of it ultimately escapes into the surroundings as heat that can never be eaten. Some plant material passes through undigested. Only the small fraction locked into new rabbit tissue is available to whatever eats the rabbit next.

A trophic transfer efficiency compares matched energy inputs and outputs over a stated interval. A ten-percent example is useful for calculation, but actual efficiencies vary among organisms and conditions. For the supplied 10% chain, 10,000 kilocalories at the producer level gives 1,000, 100 and 10 at the next three levels. The rest is not destroyed or all instantly converted to heat: unassimilated material, respiration and other pathways also transfer energy. Thermodynamic constraints do not require a universal exact 90% loss at every step.

A transfer fraction belongs to a stated energy accountA transfer fraction belongs to a stated energy accountSupplied energy transfer (kJ / matched interval)Producer level20000Primary consumers2000Secondary consumers200Tertiary consumers20Using 10% each step: 20,000 → 2,000 → 200 → 20 kJ.
Original stated 10%-transfer calculation, not observed efficiencies from one ecosystem.

A conventional energy pyramid compares energy transfer over the same area and time, and helps explain limits on supported trophic pathways. Standing biomass and organism count are different quantities: aquatic producers can turn over rapidly enough that a small instantaneous stock supports a larger consumer stock, and one tree can support many insects. Food-web boundaries, omnivory and unequal production complicate simple levels. Do not turn the energy constraint into a guarantee that producers are always most numerous or have the greatest standing mass.

A small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverA small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverSupplied standing mass at one instantProducer standingbiomass20Consumer standingbiomass100Rapid producer turnover can replenish a small standing stock.Energy-flow rate and standing biomass are different quantities.
Original snapshot biomass example, not a measured aquatic ecosystem or a matched energy-flow pyramid.

Food-system comparisons should state the service, material/energy inputs and conditions rather than infer an exact land-use outcome from a universal 10% rule. Biomagnification concerns increasing concentration of certain persistent substances across a specified trophic pathway; it is different from energy transfer and not automatic for every chemical. This gives a second reason to trace the actual material, uptake and elimination mechanisms instead of applying the energy fraction as a toxin-concentration formula.

Food-web arrows normally show transfer from resource to consumer, not simply which animal points toward its prey. Producers incorporate energy into organic matter, and decomposers use dead material and wastes from multiple levels. Read the arrow convention in each diagram.

Only part of consumed energy becomes new biomass available to the next level. Respiration, unassimilated material and other transfers reduce that amount. A ten-percent rule is an illustrative approximation rather than a constant for every species and condition.

Energy pyramids help explain why long chains have limited support, but omnivory and complex webs blur fixed levels. Track a stated energy amount using a supplied efficiency and acknowledge the boundaries. Useful energy eventually transfers to surroundings as thermal energy.

Build your understanding

Use three flexible study sessions: core explanation and Parts 1–2; Parts 3–4 with their reasoning checks and models; then the whole-unit application, worked examples, independent practice, and exit check. Allow about 50–60 minutes per session, including diagrams, data work, and notebook explanations. Attempt each check before opening its guidance. Schedule chapter investigations, review, and exams separately; add time where prerequisites are uncertain.

Part 1 · Trophic levels as a position, not a species

A trophic level is a position in a specified transfer path, not always one permanent rank for a species. Omnivory connects several food sources; a food web combines many paths. Arrows here point from resource to consumer. Decomposers act on dead material and wastes from several levels, rather than only the final predator. Their chemical breakdown differs from a scavenger consuming a carcass, though both connect detrital pathways. Identify what the arrow transfers before predicting an effect.

Food-web arrows track material and energy transferFood-web arrows track material and energy transferProducerConsumerPredatorDecomposerResource → consumer; dead material / wastes reach decomposers
Original selected web with grouped organisms and representative routes; it omits many links and is not a surveyed ecosystem.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Why should decomposers connect with more than the top predator?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

Dead material and wastes originate throughout the web; their resources are not confined to one final level.

A trophic level describes a position in the flow of energy: producers capture it, primary consumers eat producers, secondary consumers eat primary consumers, and so on. Decomposers act on dead material from every level. The level is a role rather than a fixed label, and many species occupy more than one — an omnivore eating both plants and animals feeds at two levels at once.

That is why food webs are more realistic than food chains. A chain shows one pathway; a web shows the many pathways that actually exist, including species that feed at several levels and predators with several prey. Drawing a chain is useful for tracing energy, but treating it as a complete description overstates how simple real ecosystems are.

Pause and explain

Why can one species occupy more than one trophic level?

Check your reasoning after answering

A trophic level describes what an organism is eating, not what species it is. An omnivore that eats both plants and herbivores feeds as a primary consumer and a secondary consumer at the same time.

Part 2 · The ten percent approximation and what follows from it

A trophic transfer efficiency compares a specified output available at a later level with the relevant input in the same interval and boundary. A 10% transfer is a useful supplied approximation, not a biological constant forced by thermodynamics for every species. Unassimilated material, respiration and other transfers contribute differently. Energy not in new biomass is not destroyed and not all of it instantly becomes heat. Applying a fraction repeatedly requires a clearly stated chain and matched quantity rather than mixing energy, organism count and standing mass.

A transfer fraction belongs to a stated energy accountA transfer fraction belongs to a stated energy accountSupplied energy transfer (kJ / matched interval)Producer level20000Primary consumers2000Secondary consumers200Tertiary consumers20Using 10% each step: 20,000 → 2,000 → 200 → 20 kJ.
Original stated 10%-transfer calculation, not observed efficiencies from one ecosystem.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

At a fourth level after three 10% transfers from 20,000 kJ, how much is represented?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

20 kJ in this specified model; the fraction must not be assumed universal.

Roughly a tenth of the energy at one trophic level becomes available at the next. The rest is respired and released as heat, excreted, or simply never eaten. The figure varies considerably between ecosystems and should be treated as an order-of-magnitude approximation, not a constant, but it is accurate enough to explain several otherwise puzzling patterns.

Chain length is the clearest. Starting from 20,000 kJ in producers, a tenth leaves 2,000 at the second level, 200 at the third, and 20 at the fourth — a thousandfold reduction after three transfers. There is simply not enough energy left to support a fifth or sixth level, which is why food chains are short everywhere rather than in particular places.

Pause and explain

Using a tenth at each transfer, how much of 20,000 kJ reaches the fourth trophic level, and what does the result explain?

Check your reasoning after answering

20,000 × 0.1³ = 20 kJ. The thousandfold reduction explains why food chains rarely exceed four or five levels: too little energy remains to support a viable population at another level.

Part 3 · Three pyramids that need not match

Standing biomass is material present at one time; production is new material per time. A producer community can turn over rapidly, sustaining consumers while its instantaneous mass remains relatively small, as some aquatic comparisons show. Pyramids of numbers can also invert when many consumers depend on a few large producers. A conventional energy-transfer pyramid uses matched rates and boundaries, not the same snapshot quantity. Distinguish stocks, rates and organism counts before declaring a diagram impossible or generalizing to every system.

A small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverA small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverSupplied standing mass at one instantProducer standingbiomass20Consumer standingbiomass100Rapid producer turnover can replenish a small standing stock.Energy-flow rate and standing biomass are different quantities.
Original snapshot biomass example, not a measured aquatic ecosystem or a matched energy-flow pyramid.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Does greater consumer standing mass imply energy was created between trophic levels?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

No. Standing stock differs from production/transfer rate; rapid producer turnover and the stated time boundary matter.

A pyramid of energy always narrows upward, because transfer losses are unavoidable. A pyramid of biomass usually narrows but can be inverted where producers are small, fast-growing, and rapidly consumed, as in some aquatic systems where a small standing crop of algae supports a larger mass of consumers at any instant. A pyramid of numbers can be any shape, since it counts individuals regardless of size.

The reason these differ is that each measures a different quantity: energy flow over time, mass present at an instant, and individual count. A single large tree supporting thousands of insects gives a pyramid of numbers wider at the second level, while the energy pyramid for the same ecosystem still narrows. Noticing which quantity a diagram shows is the skill.

Pause and explain

Why can a biomass pyramid be inverted at an instant while an energy pyramid cannot be?

Check your reasoning after answering

Biomass measures the mass present at one moment, and fast-growing producers can be consumed almost as quickly as they are produced, leaving a small standing crop supporting a larger consumer mass. Energy measures flow over time, and transfer losses mean the total passing to a higher level is always less.

Part 4 · Webs, redundancy, and disturbance

Redundancy means several components can contribute similar functions under conditions; it is not a guarantee that they are interchangeable in amount or quality. A predator losing one prey may decline, switch diets or move, changing pressure on other prey. Indirect effects can therefore reach organisms not linked to the initial change. Evaluate resource availability, feeding preference, competition and timing. A food-web diagram proposes possible routes; quantitative outcomes require observed rates and other constraints rather than one automatic up/down prediction.

Alternative resources can buffer a loss and spread its effectsAlternative resources can buffer a loss and spread its effectsThree prey resources; one is reducedDiet shifts can change pressure on remaining prey and the wider web.
Original selected resource-network perturbation, not a deterministic prediction for a real predator population.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Why might switching to another prey cause effects beyond the predator itself?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

It changes consumption pressure and associated interactions on the remaining prey and their partners.

A food web's structure determines how a loss propagates. In a chain, removing one species cuts the pathway and everything above it loses its supply. In a web where a predator has several prey, the loss of one prey species shifts feeding onto the others rather than eliminating the predator, so the effect is spread rather than concentrated.

That spreading has consequences of its own. Pressure on the remaining prey increases, which can cause their populations to fall and produce further changes in the web. Redundancy makes an ecosystem better able to absorb a loss without collapse, but it does not make losses consequence-free, and tracing the knock-on effects is part of interpreting any removal.

Pause and explain

A predator loses one of its three prey species. Predict the consequences and name the one most often overlooked.

Check your reasoning after answering

The predator's population may decline without collapsing, because it can shift to the other two prey. The overlooked consequence is the increased predation pressure on those remaining prey species, which can reduce their numbers and cause further changes elsewhere in the web.

Apply the whole unit · Audit an ecosystem's energy figures

Illustrative annual energy figures for a lake, in kJ per square metre. Energy fixed by algae: 31,000. Energy in zooplankton tissue produced: 2,790. Energy in small fish tissue produced: 251. Energy in large fish tissue produced: 23. Standing biomass measured on one day: algae 4 g/m², zooplankton 11 g/m².

Your task

Calculate the transfer percentage at each of the three steps, state whether the energy pyramid narrows as expected, explain why the standing biomass figures appear inverted while the energy figures do not, and state how many further trophic levels this system could plausibly support. Then name the assumption that comparing a one-day biomass measurement with annual energy figures requires.

What your response should show

  • Choose the appropriate biological model or relationship and state the conditions it assumes.
  • Show the counts, rates, ratios, or intermediate reasoning the question requires.
  • Use the supplied evidence to justify the conclusion and separate observation from inference.
  • Identify a meaningful limitation, uncertainty, or next measurement.
Response guidance — after your attempt
  1. Algae to zooplankton: 2,790 / 31,000 × 100 = 9.0 percent.

  2. Zooplankton to small fish: 251 / 2,790 × 100 = 9.0 percent.

  3. Small fish to large fish: 23 / 251 × 100 ≈ 9.2 percent.

  4. The energy pyramid narrows at every step, as it must, with each level holding roughly a tenth of the one below.

  5. Explain the biomass inversion: zooplankton biomass of 11 g/m² exceeds the algae's 4 g/m² because algae are consumed nearly as fast as they grow, so the standing crop at any instant is small even though the annual energy they fix is large.

  6. Project further levels: a fifth level would receive about 9 percent of 23 kJ, roughly 2 kJ per square metre per year, which is almost certainly too little to sustain a population, so the system supports about four levels.

  7. Name the assumption: comparing instantaneous biomass with annual energy flow assumes the one-day measurement represents the year, which is doubtful if algae bloom seasonally.

Transfers are 9.0, 9.0 and about 9.2 percent, so the energy pyramid narrows at every step and each level retains close to a tenth of the one below. The standing biomass looks inverted — 11 g/m² of zooplankton above 4 g/m² of algae — but this is not a contradiction: biomass is the mass present at one instant, and fast-growing algae that are grazed almost as quickly as they grow maintain a small standing crop while supplying a large annual energy flow. A fifth trophic level would receive roughly 2 kJ per square metre per year, far too little to support a population, so four levels is the realistic limit here. The comparison between the two kinds of figure rests on an assumption worth stating: that a single day's biomass represents the whole year. If algae bloom seasonally, that day may be unrepresentative, and repeated sampling through the year would be needed before the inversion could be treated as a stable feature of the lake.

Scientific references and adapted source figures

Parent / teacher teaching notes

The three pyramids are the part of this unit worth real attention, because the shapes can differ and students assume they cannot. Ask which quantity is being plotted before discussing any pyramid's shape. The chain-length calculation is quick and turns "food chains are short" into something derived rather than asserted, and the ten percent figure should always be described as an approximation — stating that honestly is also what makes the diet comparison in the assessment defensible. Ask for an explanation of each label, arrow and axis before calculation. Keep first and revised models; attempt the changed case before consulting guidance. Distinguish invented instructional records from named historical sources. Source chromosome symbols are allele-category models, not DNA sequences. These independently authored high-school supplements are not the full OpenSciEd teacher editions or an endorsement.

An energy pyramid with producers at the wide base and progressively smaller bands for primary consumers, secondary consumers, and top predators, illustrating roughly a 90% energy loss at each step.

Each step up the pyramid keeps only about 10% of the energy below it, so producers form a wide, energy-rich base and top predators a thin peak.

The key idea

Energy enters food webs through producers and transfers through feeding and detrital pathways. Only a portion becomes production available to another level; the fraction depends on the stated organisms, interval and boundary. Energy, standing biomass and organism numbers are different quantities.

The 10% Rule (energy transfer)

Energy at next trophic level ≈ Energy at current level × 10%

only about 10% of the energy stored at one trophic level is passed to the next (e.g., producers to primary consumers); the remaining ~90% fuels life processes or is lost as heat.

Worked examples

Example 1

In a grassland, the producers store 100,000 kcal of energy. Using the 10% rule, about how much energy is available to the tertiary consumers (the third level of consumers above the producers)?
  1. Producers store 100,000 kcal.
  2. Primary consumers get about 10%: 100,000 × 0.10 = 10,000 kcal.
  3. Secondary consumers get about 10% of that: 10,000 × 0.10 = 1,000 kcal.
  4. Tertiary consumers get about 10% again: 1,000 × 0.10 = 100 kcal.
Answer: About 100 kcal — only one-thousandth of the energy the producers originally stored reaches the tertiary consumers.

Example 2 · Worked application

Producer production is 6000 kJ and supplied transfer efficiency to consumers is 12%. Estimate consumer production.
  1. Convert 12% to 0.12.
  2. 6000×0.12=720 kJ.
  3. Efficiency is supplied for this case, not a universal constant.
Answer: 720 kJ.
Check the reasoning

Production transferred is only part of the total consumed-energy account.

Example 3

Using the 10% rule, explain why a food chain rarely has more than four or five links, and why an ecosystem supports far more producers than top predators.
  1. At every step up a food chain, about 90% of the energy is used for life processes or lost as heat, and only about 10% is passed on.
  2. After four or five steps, so little of the original energy remains that there is not enough to support the biomass of yet another trophic level.
  3. Because each level holds only about a tenth of the energy (and biomass) of the level below, the ecosystem can sustain a large base of producers but only a very small number of energy-hungry top predators.
Answer: Repeated 90% losses drain the available energy so quickly that only about four or five links can be supported, and only a tiny population of top predators can survive on the sliver of energy that reaches the top of the pyramid.

Example 4

A level contains 8000 kJ of production; supplied transfer efficiency to the next is 15%. Find the next level's production.
  1. Convert 15% to 0.15.
  2. 8000×0.15=1200 kJ.
Answer: 1200 kJ under the supplied efficiency; remaining energy is not all converted into one identical output.

Example 5 · Find and fix the mistake

Context: Producer production is 6000 kJ and supplied transfer efficiency to consumers is 12%. Estimate consumer production. A student claims: “Exactly 10% always transfers at every trophic level.” Evaluate the claim and write a corrected explanation.
  1. Test the claim against the stated conditions: Production transferred is only part of the total consumed-energy account.
  2. Efficiencies vary with organisms, conditions and the energy measure used.
Answer: Efficiencies vary with organisms, conditions and the energy measure used.
Check the reasoning

Production transferred is only part of the total consumed-energy account.

Example 6 · Reason from the visual evidence

A small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverA small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverSupplied standing mass at one instantProducer standingbiomass20Consumer standingbiomass100Rapid producer turnover can replenish a small standing stock.Energy-flow rate and standing biomass are different quantities.
Original snapshot biomass example, not a measured aquatic ecosystem or a matched energy-flow pyramid.
Does greater consumer standing mass imply energy was created between trophic levels?
  1. Standing biomass is material present at one time; production is new material per time. A producer community can turn over rapidly, sustaining consumers while its instantaneous mass remains relatively small, as some aquatic comparisons show. Pyramids of numbers can also invert when many consumers depend on a few large producers. A conventional energy-transfer pyramid uses matched rates and boundaries, not the same snapshot quantity. Distinguish stocks, rates and organism counts before declaring a diagram impossible or generalizing to every system.
  2. No. Standing stock differs from production/transfer rate; rapid producer turnover and the stated time boundary matter.
Answer: No. Standing stock differs from production/transfer rate; rapid producer turnover and the stated time boundary matter.
Check the reasoning

Original snapshot biomass example, not a measured aquatic ecosystem or a matched energy-flow pyramid.

Avoid these mistakes

Check your understanding

A level contains 8000 kJ of production; supplied transfer efficiency to the next is 15%. Find the next level's production.

Discuss the answer

1200 kJ under the supplied efficiency; remaining energy is not all converted into one identical output.

Why do decomposers connect to more than the top level of a food web?

Discuss the answer

Dead material and wastes arise from producers and consumers at several levels. Decomposer pathways connect those resources and nutrient return, rather than only the final predator.

Return to the phenomenon

Return to the initial case. Why can fewer producers by count or standing mass still support many consumers? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Compare explanations after your attempt

Energy and matter transfer need defined accounts; biomass/number snapshots and indirect web effects cannot be inferred from one fixed fraction alone.

What should we investigate next?

Which comparison would test a remaining uncertainty? State what you would change, keep comparable and measure.

Investigate, explain and revise

Complete these tasks after the teaching parts. Preserve your first model and a supported revision; use guidance after a real attempt.

Activity 1 · Return to the opening case

Assigned reading and preparation

Use the opening question, defined terms, Parts 1–4 and your notebook. The supplied-data route needs no equipment or external account.

Your task

Return to the initial case. Why can fewer producers by count or standing mass still support many consumers? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Success criteria

  • Use relevant stated observations.
  • Explain the mechanism with a labeled model.
  • Distinguish quantities and assumptions.
  • Describe a revision and a useful next test.
Hint

Follow objects, materials and information separately. Check what each measured quantity means.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

Energy and matter transfer need defined accounts; biomass/number snapshots and indirect web effects cannot be inferred from one fixed fraction alone.

Activity 2 · Transfer to a changed case

Assigned reading and preparation

Cover the worked guidance and use the unit explanations/figures to solve a changed problem.

Your task

A supplied chain transfers 15% of 8,000 kJ to its primary consumer level, then 8% of that to a secondary level. Calculate both outputs and explain why 10% should not replace the supplied values.

Success criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the biological mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.
Hint

Name the stated conditions, select the relevant mechanism and show intermediate reasoning.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

The outputs are 1,200 kJ and 96 kJ. The stated transfer fractions define this comparison; ten percent is an approximation, not a compulsory constant.

Words to know

autotroph
A 'self-feeder' — an organism such as a plant, alga, or certain bacterium that makes its own food, usually by photosynthesis. Also called a producer.
heterotroph
An 'other-feeder' — an organism that gets energy by consuming other organisms. Also called a consumer; includes herbivores, carnivores, and decomposers.
trophic level
A feeding step in an ecosystem — producers, then primary consumers, then secondary consumers, and so on.
biomass
The total mass of living matter at a trophic level or in an area; a rough stand-in for how much stored energy is present.
energy pyramid
A diagram showing how much usable energy is available at each trophic level, with producers forming the wide base.
ten percent rule
The generalization that only about 10% of the energy stored at one trophic level is passed on to the next; roughly 90% is used or lost as heat.
standing biomass
The biological material present at one instant, distinct from production per time.
transfer efficiency
A matched output/input ratio for a specified trophic transfer, time interval and boundary.

The lake study behind the '10% rule'

In 1942, ecologist Raymond Lindeman published a painstaking study of energy moving through a small Minnesota lake, becoming one of the first scientists to actually measure — rather than just describe — how much energy passes from one trophic level to the next. His work helped launch the field of ecosystem ecology and gave the '10% rule' its empirical footing. Real transfer efficiencies actually range from about 2% to 20% depending on the ecosystem; 10% is a convenient round average, not a law of nature.

A stubborn misconception: energy is not recycled

Because matter cycles so neatly, students often assume energy must cycle too — but it doesn't. Energy makes a strictly one-way trip: it enters as sunlight, gets passed up the trophic levels while about 90% is shed as heat at each step, and finally leaves the ecosystem as heat that can never be reused. That's why the arrows in a food web all point one direction and never loop back, and why ecosystems need a constant fresh supply of solar energy but can get by recycling the same atoms of matter indefinitely.

Gross vs net productivity: the base you can actually eat

Producers don't hand over everything they capture. Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the total energy plants capture through photosynthesis, but plants burn a big share of it on their own respiration just to stay alive. What's left — net primary productivity (NPP) — is the energy actually stored as new plant growth, and that's the real amount available to the herbivores that eat them. When ecologists draw an energy pyramid, its base is NPP, which is why the productivity of an ecosystem, not just its greenery, sets how much animal life it can support.

Toxins that ride the pyramid upward

The same 10% climb that drains energy can concentrate poison. Persistent chemicals like DDT and mercury don't break down and dissolve into fatty tissue, so each predator accumulates the toxins from all the prey it ever eats — a process called biomagnification. Biologist Rachel Carson's 1962 book Silent Spring traced how DDT built up in food chains and thinned the eggshells of ospreys, eagles, and other top predators, nearly wiping them out. Her work helped launch the modern environmental movement and led to DDT's ban.

When a pyramid of biomass flips upside down

An energy pyramid is always widest at the bottom, but a pyramid built from biomass — the total mass of living matter at each level at a single instant — can occasionally invert. In the open ocean, microscopic phytoplankton reproduce and get eaten so quickly that the total weight of phytoplankton present at any given moment can be smaller than the weight of the zooplankton feeding on them. Over time the phytoplankton still produce far more total energy; you're just catching a fast-spinning system in a single snapshot.

In the real world

Because roughly 90% of energy is lost turning plants into meat, producing a calorie of beef takes far more land, water, and feed than a calorie of grain — one reason plant-rich diets have a smaller environmental footprint.

Exit check

Does a 10% transfer model imply energy is destroyed at each feeding step?

Check your explanation after answering

No. Energy is conserved but dispersed through heat, metabolism, waste, and other pathways. Only part is represented in production at the next level, and 10% is an approximation.

Explain your reasoning without notes. If a key idea is missing, revisit the lesson and try again.

Problem 1

An organism that makes its own food from sunlight, carbon dioxide, and water is best described as a(n)
  1. primary consumer
  2. decomposer
  3. autotroph
  4. heterotroph
Answer and explanation

autotroph

Autotrophs (producers) build their own food, usually through photosynthesis; heterotrophs must consume other organisms.

Problem 2

Producers in a pond store 60,000 kcal of energy. Using the 10% rule, how many kcal are available to the primary consumers?
Answer and explanation

6000 kcal

60,000 × 0.10 = 6,000 kcal.

Problem 3

If secondary consumers have 600 kcal of energy available, about how many kcal reach the tertiary consumers above them?
Answer and explanation

60 kcal

600 × 0.10 = 60 kcal.

Problem 4

Which trophic level in an energy pyramid has the LEAST usable energy available?
  1. Producers
  2. Primary consumers
  3. Secondary consumers
  4. Top predators
Answer and explanation

Top predators

Energy is lost at every step, so the top predators at the peak have the least energy available.

Problem 5

Use the 10% rule to explain why a given field of farmland can feed more people if it grows grain for humans than if it grows grain to raise cattle for beef.
Answer and explanation

When cattle eat grain, about 90% of the grain's energy is used for the cattle's own life processes or lost as heat, so only about 10% is stored as beef for people to eat. Eating the grain directly skips that lossy step, so far more of the field's captured energy actually reaches people — meaning the same land can feed many more of them.

Problem 6

A level contains 8000 kJ of production; supplied transfer efficiency to the next is 15%. Find the next level's production. Explain the reasoning in your own words.
Answer and explanation

1200 kJ under the supplied efficiency; remaining energy is not all converted into one identical output.

Convert 15% to 0.15.

8000×0.15=1200 kJ.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated conditions.
  • Show the evidence or calculation.
  • Explain the conclusion and any stated limitation.

Problem 7

A level produces 2000 kJ and transfer efficiency is 8%. Find next-level production. Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

Production transferred is only part of the total consumed-energy account.

Answer and explanation

2000×0.08=160 kJ.

Problem 8

Why do food-web arrows typically point from food to consumer?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

They represent transfer of matter and energy to the consumer; check the diagram's stated convention.

Problem 9

A small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverA small standing biomass can support a larger stock through rapid turnoverSupplied standing mass at one instantProducer standingbiomass20Consumer standingbiomass100Rapid producer turnover can replenish a small standing stock.Energy-flow rate and standing biomass are different quantities.
Original snapshot biomass example, not a measured aquatic ecosystem or a matched energy-flow pyramid.
Interpret the supplied visual. Does greater consumer standing mass imply energy was created between trophic levels?
Answer and explanation

No. Standing stock differs from production/transfer rate; rapid producer turnover and the stated time boundary matter.

Standing biomass is material present at one time; production is new material per time. A producer community can turn over rapidly, sustaining consumers while its instantaneous mass remains relatively small, as some aquatic comparisons show. Pyramids of numbers can also invert when many consumers depend on a few large producers. A conventional energy-transfer pyramid uses matched rates and boundaries, not the same snapshot quantity. Distinguish stocks, rates and organism counts before declaring a diagram impossible or generalizing to every system.

No. Standing stock differs from production/transfer rate; rapid producer turnover and the stated time boundary matter.

Response criteria

  • Read the structures, axes, directions and units correctly.
  • Connect the evidence with the biological mechanism.
  • Respect stated model assumptions and distinguish an observation from a further inference.

Problem 10

A supplied chain transfers 15% of 8,000 kJ to its primary consumer level, then 8% of that to a secondary level. Calculate both outputs and explain why 10% should not replace the supplied values.
Answer and explanation

The outputs are 1,200 kJ and 96 kJ. The stated transfer fractions define this comparison; ten percent is an approximation, not a compulsory constant.

The outputs are 1,200 kJ and 96 kJ. The stated transfer fractions define this comparison; ten percent is an approximation, not a compulsory constant.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the biological mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Browse all courses