Rates & Equilibrium — Chapter review · Physical Science: Chemistry, Grade 11
Distinguish reaction speed from equilibrium composition and calculate direction of adjustment.
Review the key ideas
Reaction Rates & Kinetics
Rates depend on a justified pathway and empirical kinetic relationships under specified conditions. Concentration, temperature, surface and catalyst effects are conditional; balanced coefficients do not generally determine rate-law exponents.
Chemical Equilibrium
Dynamic equilibrium has equal opposing rates, not necessarily equal concentrations. A disturbance changes Q or K depending on what changes; pressure predictions require volume/amount constraints, and catalysts do not change K at fixed conditions.
Equilibrium Constants & Reaction Quotients
Compare Q with K to predict adjustment; equilibrium means equal opposing rates, not equal amounts.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
3.0 mL/s
Average rate = change in amount ÷ change in time = 75 mL ÷ 25 s = 3.0 mL/s.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Heating makes particles collide more often, and — more importantly — a larger fraction of collisions carry at least the activation energy, so more collisions are effective.
Higher temperature gives particles more kinetic energy. They collide more frequently, and a much larger share of those collisions now have enough energy to clear the activation-energy barrier. Both effects increase the number of effective collisions per second, so the rate rises.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
0.015 M/s
The concentration changed by 0.90 − 0.30 = 0.60 M over 40 s. Average rate = 0.60 M ÷ 40 s = 0.015 M/s.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Toward the products
By Le Châtelier's principle, the system responds to the extra reactant by shifting in the direction that consumes it — toward the products.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Keq = 4
Keq = [HI]² ÷ ([H₂][I₂]) = (0.40)² ÷ (0.10 × 0.40) = 0.16 ÷ 0.040 = 4.0. Because Keq is greater than 1, products are favored.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Increase the pressure (the product side has fewer gas moles, 2 vs 4, so higher pressure favors NH₃) and lower the temperature (the forward reaction is exothermic, so cooling favors it). Continuously removing NH₃ would also help.
By Le Châtelier's principle: (1) Raising the pressure shifts the equilibrium toward the side with fewer moles of gas; the left has 1 + 3 = 4 moles and the right has 2, so higher pressure favors ammonia. (2) Because the forward reaction is exothermic, heat behaves like a product, so lowering the temperature shifts the equilibrium forward, making more NH₃. (Removing ammonia as it forms would also pull the equilibrium to the right.)
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
The kinetic pathway and rate change; overall reaction ΔH and equilibrium K stay the same at fixed conditions.
Response criteria
- State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
- Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
- Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
The factor is 2²×0.5=2. For total order three, k units are M⁻²s⁻¹. Assume the same law, temperature, medium and relevant pathway remain valid; the change does not establish a new mechanism.
The factor is 2²×0.5=2. For total order three, k units are M⁻²s⁻¹. Assume the same law, temperature, medium and relevant pathway remain valid; the change does not establish a new mechanism.
Response criteria
- Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
- Connect the result to the chemical mechanism or evidence relationship.
- Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Reduced volume raises partial pressures; the adjustment favors the side with fewer gas moles, ammonia, under the model.
Response criteria
- State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
- Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
- Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Q=0.80/0.70≈1.14<4, so net forward conversion is favored. Under the closed 1:1 model total concentration becomes 1.50 M and final values are A=0.30 M, B=1.20 M; the ratio returns, not the original amounts.
Q=0.80/0.70≈1.14<4, so net forward conversion is favored. Under the closed 1:1 model total concentration becomes 1.50 M and final values are A=0.30 M, B=1.20 M; the ratio returns, not the original amounts.
Response criteria
- Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
- Connect the result to the chemical mechanism or evidence relationship.
- Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.
Problem 11
Hints
Write the relationship first; substitute with consistent units.
Answer and explanation
0.2
1/5=.2.
Problem 12
Answer and explanation
Net reverse change lowers the product-to-reactant expression toward K.
Response criteria
- State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
- Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
- Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.
Problem 13
Answer and explanation
Q=0.160/(0.400)²=1.00<2.00, so net forward is favored. From an initial 0.800 M A-only inventory, conservation limits A₂ to at most 0.400 M. The equilibrium value need not reach that maximum, and no rate is given.
Q=0.160/(0.400)²=1.00<2.00, so net forward is favored. From an initial 0.800 M A-only inventory, conservation limits A₂ to at most 0.400 M. The equilibrium value need not reach that maximum, and no rate is given.
Response criteria
- Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
- Connect the result to the chemical mechanism or evidence relationship.
- Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.