Impulse & Collision Evidence — Print · Grade 12 Science

Chapter: Work, Energy & Momentum

Impulse & Collision Evidence

Learning goals

Readings for this unit

Before this unit

Momentum, velocity signs, graph areas, Newton’s laws.

Use the detailed parent plan: two core 50–60-minute sessions per focused unit, with a third assigned for selected calculation/modeling topics. First study the core explanation and Parts 1–2 with their figures/checks; next study Parts 3–4, the whole-unit application, worked cases, varied practice and exit check. Attempt reasoning before opening guidance. Extend time when actual understanding requires it; investigations and chapter assessments have separate sessions.

Start with something to explain

How can cushioning change force without eliminating the stopping impulse?

Illustrative evidence case. Two ideal pulse shapes stop the same momentum change over different times.

Impulse includes a reversal’s full signed velocity changeImpulse includes a reversal’s full signed velocity changem=0.20 kg; vi=+10 m/s; vf=−5 m/sΔp=m(vf−vi)=0.20(−5−10)=−3.0 N·s
Original signed reversal example; force direction is negative along the chosen axis.

Notice and wonder

Record two observations using the stated quantities or relationships. Keep observations separate from possible causes. Write one question that a new measurement could help answer.

How can cushioning change force without eliminating the stopping impulse?

Your first model

Shade force–time areas and label the chosen body.

Build the language from the idea

impulse
Time integral of force, equal to momentum change.
external impulse
Impulse from forces exerted by objects outside the chosen system.

Momentum p=mv is a vector quantity. Impulse J=∫Fdt changes momentum; for a known average force, J=FavgΔt=Δp. A force-time graph’s signed area gives impulse. It is the change in momentum rather than change in speed alone that matters when direction reverses.

Choose signs before subtracting: Δp=m(vfinal−vinitial). A ball moving right and bouncing left has a larger momentum change magnitude than an otherwise similar ball merely stopping. A negative result identifies the impulse direction under the selected convention.

Impulse includes a reversal’s full signed velocity changeImpulse includes a reversal’s full signed velocity changem=0.20 kg; vi=+10 m/s; vf=−5 m/sΔp=m(vf−vi)=0.20(−5−10)=−3.0 N·s
Original signed reversal example; force direction is negative along the chosen axis.

A longer stopping time can reduce average force for the same momentum change. Padding or a crumple zone increases interaction time and distance; it does not remove the need for momentum change. Peak force can differ greatly from average force, so an average-force calculation does not describe every instant.

A longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeA longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeForce magnitude (N)010020030000.010.020.030.04Time (s)Short pulse:3 N·sLong pulse:3 N·s
Calculated equal-impulse pulses, not medical or crash-test evidence.

Momentum conservation applies to a system when net external impulse is negligible during the interval. Internal forces cancel between interacting bodies by Newton’s third law. Individual object momentum changes while total system momentum can stay the same. Define the system before claiming conservation.

Kinetic energy need not be conserved in an inelastic collision; some energy becomes deformation, vibration, or thermal energy. Total energy remains accounted for in an appropriately inclusive system. In an elastic ideal collision, both total momentum and total kinetic energy are conserved.

Use supplied force-time data or gentle tabletop models. Collision experiments with people, fast projectiles, or fragile objects are unnecessary. Evaluate whether friction or an external support had enough impulse to undermine the isolated-system approximation.

Build your understanding

Use the detailed parent plan: two core 50–60-minute sessions per focused unit, with a third assigned for selected calculation/modeling topics. First study the core explanation and Parts 1–2 with their figures/checks; next study Parts 3–4, the whole-unit application, worked cases, varied practice and exit check. Attempt reasoning before opening guidance. Extend time when actual understanding requires it; investigations and chapter assessments have separate sessions.

Part 1 · Relate impulse to a momentum change

Impulse J is the time integral of force and equals momentum change. A 0.20 kg ball reversing from+10 to−5 m/s changes momentum by−3.0 kg·m/s, equivalently−3.0 N·s. Subtract signed velocities before multiplying by mass. Using the difference of speed magnitudes would miss part of the reversal. The momentum theorem concerns net force on the selected object; one sensor’s force may not be the entire net force.

Impulse includes a reversal’s full signed velocity changeImpulse includes a reversal’s full signed velocity changem=0.20 kg; vi=+10 m/s; vf=−5 m/sΔp=m(vf−vi)=0.20(−5−10)=−3.0 N·s
Original signed reversal example; force direction is negative along the chosen axis.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

What is the average net force if this change takes 0.020 s?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

Favg=Δp/Δt=−3.0/0.020=−150 N.

Impulse is the time integral of net external force and equals the momentum change of the selected system. For a constant or average net force, J=FavgΔt. It is a vector account, so reversal can produce a larger change than merely stopping from the same initial speed.

A ball rebounding at the original speed changes momentum direction and has a change magnitude twice its initial momentum.

Pause and explain

Why can a rebound have greater impulse than stopping?

Check your reasoning after answering

The momentum must first decrease to zero and then change to the opposite direction, giving a larger vector difference.

Part 2 · Read a force-time trace using area

A force–time trace shows how force varies during contact. If its direction is fixed, the signed area gives impulse; the displayed positive triangle has area 3.0 N·s and average force 150 N over 0.020 s. Peak force 300 N is twice that average for this particular shape. A different pulse with the same area can have a different peak, so neither peak alone nor duration alone determines the momentum change.

Force–time area determines the impulse of a pulseForce–time area determines the impulse of a pulseForce magnitude for one-direction pulse (N)010020030000.010.02Contact time (s)Triangle area=½×0.020×300=3.0 N·s.
Calculated illustrative triangular pulse; positive force direction is chosen independently of the preceding reversal example.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

What constant force over 0.040 s has the same impulse?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

75 N gives 75×0.040=3.0 N·s in the same direction.

Signed area under a force-time graph gives impulse. The largest recorded force is a peak, not necessarily the average. A triangular pulse and rectangular pulse with the same peak and duration can have different areas. Include the full pulse and a suitable baseline.

A triangular 100 N pulse lasting 0.020 s has impulse 1.0 N·s, compared with 2.0 N·s for a rectangular pulse.

Pause and explain

Does equal peak force imply equal impulse?

Check your reasoning after answering

No. Pulse duration and shape matter because impulse depends on the complete force-time area.

Part 3 · Separate average-force reduction from guarantees

For a fixed momentum change, increasing the stopping interval reduces average net force because Favg=Δp/Δt. The two calculated triangles have equal 3 N·s area but different durations and peaks. Real cushioning can also change rebound, contact geometry and pulse shape, so a longer interval alone does not guarantee a specific peak or injury outcome. Compare actual force histories under controlled conditions rather than treating a simple average-force model as a complete safety prediction.

A longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeA longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeForce magnitude (N)010020030000.010.020.030.04Time (s)Short pulse:3 N·sLong pulse:3 N·s
Calculated equal-impulse pulses, not medical or crash-test evidence.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

Why must rebound be compared when testing two cushions?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

Rebound changes final velocity and therefore Δp, so the “same momentum change” assumption may no longer hold.

For the same momentum change, extending stopping time reduces average force in the simple model. Peak force and forces on particular tissues or parts can still depend on the pulse shape and contact geometry. An average-force calculation alone cannot certify protective performance.

A longer stopping interval can explain a design mechanism, but comparable force traces and repeated testing are needed to evaluate the device.

Pause and explain

What does J/Δt establish?

Check your reasoning after answering

It gives the average net force for that interval. It does not uniquely determine peak force or local stresses.

Part 4 · Check system boundaries and sensor meaning

A sensor records a particular contact force, with finite calibration, sampling and response time. The momentum theorem uses net external force on the object over the same interval. If weight matters along the measured component, include its impulse rather than silently equating contact force with net force. Consistent sign conventions, time alignment and measured velocities are essential when comparing a force-trace area with mΔv. Disagreement can reveal a boundary or measurement problem.

Match sensor force with the selected momentum accountMatch sensor force with the selected momentum accountRecordWhat it measuresNeeded checkContact sensorOne interaction forceOther forces / calibrationMotion recordVelocity before/afterFrame and time intervalComparisonArea versus mΔvSame object and componentA matching area supports an account within uncertainty.
Original evidence-comparison checklist for force and motion records.

Read the visual model

Identify the labeled structures and units, then trace the arrows or compare values under the caption’s stated conditions. Separate the displayed evidence from a further inference. Write your reasoning before opening the guidance.

When might weight’s impulse be negligible?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

For a sufficiently short interval or a horizontal component with no gravity projection, justified against the size of other impulses.

A sensor records one interaction, while momentum change depends on net external force. Weight or other contacts may need inclusion over the interval. Calibration, sampling rate, timing, and rebound velocity affect whether a recorded pulse matches the momentum account.

For a short horizontal cart impact, other horizontal impulses may be negligible. For a longer vertical event, gravity may require explicit inclusion.

Pause and explain

When can one sensor force be treated as the net force?

Check your reasoning after answering

Only when other relevant force contributions are negligible or already accounted for in the stated direction and interval.

Apply the whole unit · Compare rebound and stop intervals

Illustrative 0.200 kg ball has incoming velocity +10.0 m/s and outgoing velocity −5.00 m/s. Compare contact intervals 0.0100 s and 0.0300 s; neglect other impulse along the axis.

Your task

Find momentum change and average contact force for each interval. Explain what the comparison establishes and what it cannot establish about peak force or a protective design.

What your response should show

  • Define the system, quantities, units, and relevant conditions before selecting a model.
  • Show intermediate calculations or a labeled evidence account, including signs or denominators.
  • Explain how the supplied evidence supports the conclusion rather than reporting only an answer.
  • Identify a meaningful uncertainty, model limit, or measurement needed to test the conclusion.
Response guidance — after your attempt
  1. Δp=0.200×(−5−10)=−3.00 kg·m/s.

  2. For 0.0100 s, Favg=−300 N; for 0.0300 s, Favg=−100 N.

  3. The impulse stays −3.00 N·s despite the different average-force magnitudes.

The longer interval lowers average force for the same specified momentum change. A peak force cannot be reconstructed from average and duration alone, and real designs may also alter rebound velocity. Compare calibrated full traces and consistent initial conditions before drawing a design conclusion.

Scientific references and source-model foundations

Parent / teacher teaching notes

Ask the student to subtract signed velocities and distinguish average from peak. Avoid presenting this supplied calculation as an injury or equipment-safety rating. Ask the learner to explain each symbol, axis, unit and arrow before calculating. Calculated examples, supplied illustrative records and actual historical observations are labeled separately. Selected public OpenSciEd middle-school source figures are foundation examples, not complete high-school editions or an endorsement; all advanced explanations are supplied locally.

Equal impulse, different force and duration20 N × 0.10 s10 N × 0.20 sBoth areas:2 N·sTime (s) →F(N)
Two rectangular force-time pulses have equal 2 N·s area. A 20 N pulse over 0.10 s and 10 N pulse over 0.20 s give the same momentum change.

The key idea

Impulse is signed momentum change; the relevant system boundary determines conservation.

Worked examples

Example 1

A .20 kg ball goes from +6 to −4 m/s. Find impulse.
  1. Δp=.20(−4−6).
  2. Track the negative direction.
Answer: −2.0N·s

Example 2 · Worked application

A 0.20 kg ball's velocity changes from +10 to −5 m/s in 0.10 s. Find impulse and average net force.
  1. Δp=m(v_f−v_i)=0.20(−5−10)=−3.0 kg·m/s.
  2. Impulse=Δp=−3.0 N·s.
  3. F_avg=Δp/Δt=−3.0/0.10=−30 N.
Answer: Impulse −3.0 N·s; average net force −30 N.
Check the reasoning

A reversal requires signed velocities, not just a speed difference.

Example 3

A 2N·s impulse acts over .010 s versus .100 s. Compare average forces.
  1. Favg=J/Δt.
  2. 2/.010=200N and 2/.100=20N.
Answer: A tenfold longer time gives one-tenth the average force.

Example 4 · Find and fix the mistake

Context: A 0.20 kg ball's velocity changes from +10 to −5 m/s in 0.10 s. Find impulse and average net force. A student claims: “A longer stopping time always increases average stopping force for the same momentum change.” Evaluate the claim and write a corrected explanation.
  1. Test the claim against the stated conditions: A reversal requires signed velocities, not just a speed difference.
  2. F_avg=Δp/Δt; increasing time reduces average magnitude for fixed Δp.
Answer: F_avg=Δp/Δt; increasing time reduces average magnitude for fixed Δp.
Check the reasoning

A reversal requires signed velocities, not just a speed difference.

Example 5 · Reason from the visual model

A longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeA longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeForce magnitude (N)010020030000.010.020.030.04Time (s)Short pulse:3 N·sLong pulse:3 N·s
Calculated equal-impulse pulses, not medical or crash-test evidence.
Why must rebound be compared when testing two cushions?
  1. For a fixed momentum change, increasing the stopping interval reduces average net force because Favg=Δp/Δt. The two calculated triangles have equal 3 N·s area but different durations and peaks. Real cushioning can also change rebound, contact geometry and pulse shape, so a longer interval alone does not guarantee a specific peak or injury outcome. Compare actual force histories under controlled conditions rather than treating a simple average-force model as a complete safety prediction.
  2. Rebound changes final velocity and therefore Δp, so the “same momentum change” assumption may no longer hold.
Answer: Rebound changes final velocity and therefore Δp, so the “same momentum change” assumption may no longer hold.
Check the reasoning

Calculated equal-impulse pulses, not medical or crash-test evidence.

Avoid these mistakes

Check your understanding

Why distinguish average from peak collision force?

Discuss the answer

The force varies through the collision; impulse fixes its area, not a single maximum value.

Return to the phenomenon

Return to the initial case. How can cushioning change force without eliminating the stopping impulse? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Compare explanations after your attempt

Equal impulse permits different average and peak forces; rebound and actual pulse shapes must also be checked.

What should we investigate next?

Which comparison would test a remaining uncertainty? State what you would change, keep comparable and measure.

Investigate, calculate and revise

Keep a first model and an evidence-supported revision. Attempt each task before opening guidance; all required explanations and supplied-data routes are available locally.

Activity 1 · Return to the opening case

Assigned reading and preparation

Use the opening phenomenon, unit definitions and explained Parts 1–4.

Your task

Return to the initial case. How can cushioning change force without eliminating the stopping impulse? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Success criteria

  • Use the stated observations and appropriate units.
  • Connect a labeled model with the physical/environmental mechanism.
  • State assumptions and an evidence limitation.
  • Explain a substantive revision or next test.
Hint

Keep object/material identity, material transfer and energy account distinct.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

Equal impulse permits different average and peak forces; rebound and actual pulse shapes must also be checked.

Activity 2 · Transfer to a changed case

Assigned reading and preparation

Cover the worked answer and use the explained models, relationships and notebook.

Your task

A 0.50 kg object slows from 6 m/s to 0 over 0.15 s. Find impulse and average net force. If it rebounds at−2 m/s instead, find the new impulse.

Success criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.
Hint

Name known quantities and conditions, show intermediate steps and check conservation.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

Stopping impulse=0.50(0−6)=−3 N·s and Favg=−20 N. With rebound, impulse=0.50(−2−6)=−4 N·s, so the fixed-impulse comparison no longer applies.

Words to know

impulse
Time integral of force, equal to momentum change.
external impulse
Impulse from forces exerted by objects outside the chosen system.

In the real world

Use the chapter investigation to connect this unit to measured evidence and a practical decision.

Exit check

Why distinguish average from peak collision force?

Check your explanation after answering

The force varies through the collision; impulse fixes its area, not a single maximum value.

Explain your reasoning without notes. If a key idea is missing, revisit the lesson and try again.

Problem 1

A 3 kg object slows from 5 m/s to 0. Find signed impulse.
Hints

Write the relationship first; substitute with consistent units.

Answer and explanation

-15 N·s

3(0−5)=−15.

Problem 2

Does padding conserve an object’s momentum?
Answer and explanation

No; it changes momentum over a longer time and can reduce average force.

Response criteria

  • State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
  • Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
  • Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.

Problem 3

A 2 kg object changes velocity −3 to+1 m/s. Find signed impulse.
Hints

List the given quantities, select a relationship, and check units before substituting.

Answer and explanation

8 N·s

2(1−(−3))=8.

Problem 4

Why define the system for collision conservation?
Answer and explanation

External forces can transfer momentum into or out of the selected system.

Response criteria

  • State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
  • Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
  • Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.

Problem 5

An object has momentum change 12 N·s over 0.30 s. Find average net force magnitude. Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

A reversal requires signed velocities, not just a speed difference.

Answer and explanation

12/0.30=40 N.

Problem 6

Why can padding reduce average collision force without changing final momentum?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

It extends the time over which the same impulse is delivered; the force–time area remains the momentum change.

Problem 7

A longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeA longer stop can reduce average force for a fixed changeForce magnitude (N)010020030000.010.020.030.04Time (s)Short pulse:3 N·sLong pulse:3 N·s
Calculated equal-impulse pulses, not medical or crash-test evidence.
Interpret the supplied visual. Why must rebound be compared when testing two cushions?
Answer and explanation

Rebound changes final velocity and therefore Δp, so the “same momentum change” assumption may no longer hold.

For a fixed momentum change, increasing the stopping interval reduces average net force because Favg=Δp/Δt. The two calculated triangles have equal 3 N·s area but different durations and peaks. Real cushioning can also change rebound, contact geometry and pulse shape, so a longer interval alone does not guarantee a specific peak or injury outcome. Compare actual force histories under controlled conditions rather than treating a simple average-force model as a complete safety prediction.

Rebound changes final velocity and therefore Δp, so the “same momentum change” assumption may no longer hold.

Response criteria

  • Interpret labels, structures, axes, units and directions correctly.
  • Explain the physical or environmental relationship or mechanism.
  • Respect stated assumptions and distinguish observation from inference.

Problem 8

A 0.50 kg object slows from 6 m/s to 0 over 0.15 s. Find impulse and average net force. If it rebounds at−2 m/s instead, find the new impulse.
Answer and explanation

Stopping impulse=0.50(0−6)=−3 N·s and Favg=−20 N. With rebound, impulse=0.50(−2−6)=−4 N·s, so the fixed-impulse comparison no longer applies.

Stopping impulse=0.50(0−6)=−3 N·s and Favg=−20 N.

With rebound, impulse=0.50(−2−6)=−4 N·s, so the fixed-impulse comparison no longer applies.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Browse all courses