Evidence for Continental Drift — Practice · Grade 9 Science
Chapter: Earth’s Interior & Plate TectonicsWhat this practice covers
By the end of Evidence for Continental Drift you should be able to:
- I can describe Alfred Wegener's continental drift hypothesis and the supercontinent Pangaea.
- I can explain how matching fossils, rock layers, continental shapes, and climate evidence support continental drift.
- I can explain how seafloor spreading and paleomagnetism finally gave continental drift a mechanism.
10 questions, multiple choice and written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: continental drift, Pangaea, seafloor spreading, paleomagnetism.
Problem 1
- Isaac Newton
- Alfred Wegener
- Charles Darwin
- Albert Einstein
Answer and explanation
Alfred Wegener
Alfred Wegener proposed continental drift in 1912, based on evidence like matching coastlines and fossils.
Problem 2
- Atlantis
- Laurasia
- Pangaea
- Gondwana
Answer and explanation
Pangaea
Wegener called the ancient supercontinent Pangaea, meaning 'all land.'
Problem 3
- Matching fossils of the same species on continents now separated by oceans
- Modern GPS measurements of plate motion
- Satellite photographs of Earth
- Identical languages spoken on separated continents
Answer and explanation
Matching fossils of the same species on continents now separated by oceans
GPS and satellites didn't exist in 1912 — Wegener relied on evidence like matching fossils, rock layers, coastlines, and climate clues.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Wegener could not explain a physical mechanism for how huge, solid continents could move or plow through solid ocean floor, so most scientists didn't accept the idea until seafloor spreading was discovered in the 1960s.
Problem 5
- The invention of the seismograph
- Seafloor spreading and paleomagnetic stripes on the ocean floor
- The discovery of Mesosaurus fossils
- Wegener's original 1912 publication
Answer and explanation
Seafloor spreading and paleomagnetic stripes on the ocean floor
Seafloor spreading, confirmed by symmetric paleomagnetic stripes recorded in ocean-floor rock, finally explained how continents could move — giving plate tectonics its mechanism.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Seafloor spreading fits the age pattern; magnetic stripes and plate-motion data provide additional tests.
New crust can form at the ridge.
As plates separate, older crust moves away symmetrically.
Response criteria
- Use the stated conditions.
- Show the evidence or calculation.
- Explain the conclusion and any stated limitation.
Problem 7
Hints
Similar appearance alone is weaker than dated, identified specimens.
Answer and explanation
An independent geological line supporting former connection, if rock ages and structures correspond.
Problem 8
Hints
State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.
Answer and explanation
Modern plate tectonics includes motion and creation/recycling of oceanic lithosphere as well as continents.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Compare dated crust ages with distance from the ridge and measure magnetic polarity patterns. Agreement of age trend and corresponding bands supports the model more than either alone.
Start at the ridge and compare successive bands moving outward on both sides. Color represents polarity record, not the literal visible color of ocean crust.
Compare dated crust ages with distance from the ridge and measure magnetic polarity patterns. Agreement of age trend and corresponding bands supports the model more than either alone.
Response criteria
- Read the labeled quantities, reference frame or objects correctly.
- Explain the relation between the visual evidence and the mechanism.
- Keep the drawing’s stated assumptions and limits in the conclusion.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
80/4 = 20 km per million years = 2 cm/year on one side; full symmetric separation is 4 cm/year. Check opposite-side age patterns and magnetic records; variable rates or asymmetric movement can challenge the assumption.
80/4 = 20 km per million years = 2 cm/year on one side; full symmetric separation is 4 cm/year. Check opposite-side age patterns and magnetic records; variable rates or asymmetric movement can challenge the assumption.
Response criteria
- Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
- Connect the result to the physical mechanism or evidence relationship.
- Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.