The Great Depression: Contraction, Households & Policy Responses — Practice · Grade 11 Social Studies
Chapter: The 1920s, Depression & New DealWhat this practice covers
By the end of The Great Depression: Contraction, Households & Policy Responses you should be able to:
- I can distinguish a stock crash from an economic depression.
- I can explain a historical connection using relevant evidence and qualify the conclusion.
6 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: context, evidence, interpretation, contraction, bank run.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
A depositor losing access to savings, an employer losing credit, and a farmer facing falling prices experience different mechanisms. Explain their connections rather than using one stock-market event as the whole causal account. International trade and monetary constraints extended the contraction beyond domestic financial markets.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
A decrease in nominal prices is not automatically a gain when wages or employment fall and fixed debts remain. Measure income, prices, and obligations together. A cheaper basket of goods may still be unaffordable to a household that has lost its earnings.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
Drought and soil practices affected agricultural regions unevenly and interacted with economic distress. The Dust Bowl was not the single cause of national unemployment. Compare environmental, market, landholding, and migration evidence to explain a particular community’s trajectory without assuming every displaced family followed the same route.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Compare a loan program, emergency bank action, direct relief, and work employment as different responses. Recovery indicators varied over time, including the 1937–1938 downturn. Later wartime mobilization changed conditions again; a policy’s contribution should be assessed through a mechanism and evidence rather than a single completion date.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The sequence supplies a plausible reinforcing contraction. It does not establish that every closure produced the same outcome or that one bank caused a national depression. Local sales and employment records could test the proposed chain.
Lost access to funds can reduce household spending.
Lower sales can lead shops to reduce work and wages.
Compare timing, alternative credit, relief, and records from other places.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Connect relevant evidence to an explained conclusion.
- Represent particular perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify an evidentiary limitation or a distinction that qualifies the claim.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Yes. Lost jobs or reduced wages can exceed the benefit of lower prices, while fixed debts remain burdensome. Compare the same household’s income, prices, and obligations over time. Deflation is not automatically improved living standards and should not be judged from one price alone.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Connect relevant evidence to an explained conclusion.
- Represent particular perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify an evidentiary limitation or a distinction that qualifies the claim.