Hunter-Gatherers of the Paleolithic Age — Practice · Grade 6 Social Studies
Chapter: Early Humans & the Neolithic RevolutionWhat this practice covers
By the end of Hunter-Gatherers of the Paleolithic Age you should be able to:
- I can explain hunter-gatherers of the paleolithic age with accurate places, periods and defined terms.
- I can distinguish a supported observation from an inference in the supplied evidence case.
- I can justify a comparison or conclusion and explain a meaningful limit.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: Paleolithic Age, hunter-gatherer, nomad, technology, migration.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
No. Mobility and settlement varied with resources, seasons and social arrangements.
No. Mobility and settlement varied with resources, seasons and social arrangements.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
No. Wood can decay; the material record is incomplete.
No. Wood can decay; the material record is incomplete.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
They reveal regional variation and sequence instead of assuming one site represents all humans.
They reveal regional variation and sequence instead of assuming one site represents all humans.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Relevant marks, associated tools, context and repeated patterns, not one isolated bone.
Relevant marks, associated tools, context and repeated patterns, not one isolated bone.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence.
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
No. Wood can decay; the material record is incomplete. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
No. Wood can decay; the material record is incomplete. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. Relevant marks, associated tools, context and repeated patterns, not one isolated bone.
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. Relevant marks, associated tools, context and repeated patterns, not one isolated bone.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Repeated activity and skilled resource use are plausible; seasonal remains may suggest repeated visits. The evidence alone does not establish an exact language, family structure or a claim of low intelligence. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.