Erie Canal: Engineering, Markets & New York Communities — Practice · Grade 7 Social Studies
Chapter: Early Republic, Markets & MigrationWhat this practice covers
By the end of Erie Canal: Engineering, Markets & New York Communities you should be able to:
- I can explain why the canal was built and why critics called it folly.
- I can calculate the effect of a fall in transport cost.
- I can describe who dug it and who gained from it.
8 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: context, primary source, interpretation, lock, transport cost.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
It links the canal’s eastern end with the Atlantic port network. The full movement depends on connected routes, not the canal segment alone.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
No. It explains a design. Labor arrangements, pay, safety, and enforcement require other evidence about actual construction and operation.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
Transport is one cost category. Incomes depend on prices, other costs, employment, ownership, and who receives savings; different quantities answer different questions.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Totals can conceal distribution. Land, labor, and community records help assess who benefited, who bore costs, and which effects the trade count cannot reveal.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The saving is 6 tokens per shipment and 30 for five shipments; the modeled charge falls 60%. These invented numbers illustrate a comparable calculation. They do not establish historical rates, every merchant’s access, workers’ conditions, land effects, or equal prosperity.
Subtract 4 from 10.
Multiply the saving by 5.
Distinguish the stipulated merchant saving from all community outcomes.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Connect relevant evidence with an explained claim or calculation.
- Represent particular perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify an assumption, evidentiary limit, or distinction that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. Transport access is a plausible mechanism, but compare migration, employment, investment, other routes, and dated evidence. A causal contribution need not be the only cause.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Connect relevant evidence with an explained claim or calculation.
- Represent particular perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify an assumption, evidentiary limit, or distinction that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
It opened in 1825 and connected the Albany/Hudson area with Buffalo and Lake Erie through a water route.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
It prevents a calculation model from being mistaken for measured historical prices and keeps the evidence claim honest.